Being made in God’s image doesn’t mean to operate as God, but to resemble him.
It’s nuts to interpret that statement to read that humans are, effectively, individual Gods.
You may be right (though that’s not really what I meant), but I’ll take the accusation that it’s a “nuts interpretation” with a pinch of salt given that this is a discussion about religion.
But then again religions can evolve – if they want to – never sure whether this is a good thing or not.
Interesting one, this. It’s a bit ‘damned if you do and damned if you don’t.’
If an organised religion evolves to be more relevant to modern times (which I personally think will do them a lot of favours), it essentially needs to backtrack on previously held beliefs and values. In a scientific field this is both easy and commonplace; you go “sorry, we’ve disproved your theory” and adapt. But in an arena which is built solely on ephemeral concepts like “faith” that’s a lot more difficult. You’ve spent a couple of millennia give or take going “look this is the way it is, trust us,” suddenly changing your mind and admitting you were wrong is incredibly difficult. A big problem facing religion in the modern day is simply one of inertia; “but we’ve always done it this way!” (which of course, is a terrible reason to do anything).