Any signed up for the Army Reserves?
the quoted figures for enlistment targets have and always wil be utter pie in the sky. In any one recruiting period, out of 100 applicants we would be lucky to have 12 go through to selection and only a handful of them would pass, and we were/are considered to be the highest recruiters… FR2020 will be a massive balls up failure..Posted 4 years agowreckerMember
Not really surprising that most folks won’t sign up to be cut-price cannon fodder.
“I know you used to be paid to be in the army, and we did fire you, and cut your pension to the quick but why not come back and do your old job in your spare time for nothing and with no pension entitlement, less equipment, lower standard training (we’ll even feed you for free if you’re away from your centre)?”
They can properly get ****ed.Posted 4 years ago
Oddly enough two of our heads of department, in Engineering, were laid off as full time employees, then taken back as contractors, then offered full time jobs again, then promoted.
However, I don’t work for a very ‘normal’ company, our last CEO was a complete fruit loop and thought every problem, especially lack of resources, could be resolved by firing people…Posted 4 years ago
Apparently they’re well below target:
“Although this is a pan-Army issue, the impact is most serious in the Army Reserve… As a stark indicator, 367 recruits were enlisted in Q1 of 2013-2014 against a target of 1,432.
“The prediction against an overall in-year target of 6,383 is that only 50% of this number will be realised.”Posted 4 years agoBigEaredBikerSubscriber
No. As I have an aversion to being shot at for naff all.
This is not true; In 2007 there was a TA chap in Basra looking after 21 Engineer Reg tool store i.e. guarding the shovels, pick axes, etc.
He was some sort of professional in the city and rather than being paid the same (£40 per day?) a regular Sapper gets was on his regular civi basic rate of pay – not only that but as he was Ops his mortgage was frozen so after 1 year active service he had a nice lump sum saved up.
If I wasn’t married with kids I’d definately rejoin the TA and volunteer for Ops. I’d also point out that the level and quality of training I receieved from the TA whilst at times patchy was far better than anything I have recieved from a civilian employer before or since and has stood me in good stead over the years.
But, I still think it is a terrible idea for a goverment that is fond of foriegn engagements to come up with a plan to reduce the military right back and expect reservists to fill the gaps.Posted 4 years ago
Didn’t the TA used to be regarded as a bit of a doss around, and an excuse to play with guns and stuff, and fly around in helicopters for a few weekends a year on Dartmoor?
Whereas since Blairs imperial crusades, it now means getting shipped straight out to a trench in Helmand Province while people fire mortars at you. Well…. for a brief period until you lose your legs in an IED explosion, then get medevaced back to the motherland to find out that the government don’t actually give a shit about you?Posted 4 years ago
Whereas since Blairs imperial crusades, it now means getting shipped straight out to a trench in Helmand Province while people fire mortars at you. Well…. for a brief period until you lose your legs in an IED explosion, then get medevaced back to the motherland to find out that the government don’t actually give a shit about you?
I guess in the ‘old days’, when Britishers fought for popular causes and didn’t mind dying for the motherland, the take-up would have been higher.
Now, it’s beans for a maiming in an unpopular no-sense war that we don’t care about.Posted 4 years ago
I reckon in the ‘old days’ people saw the role of the Ministry of Defense as providing defense for the UK against foreign aggression, not fighting wars in far flung countries at the behest of the US government.
It really is time they reverted back to the pre-1964 term and referred to “the War Office”. Doesn’t the Trade Description Act cover misnamed government departments ?Posted 4 years ago
The ‘old days’ I’m talking about was when we valiant Britishers had big guns and the foreign chaps had sticks.
To be fair it’s not much different today. Ever since Vietnam US governments have been very careful about who they pick fights with, small and very weak being the preferred adversary. And we just fight wars which the US tells us to fight. The predator drones are the ” big guns” of today and IED are the “sticks” which the foreign chaps now use.Posted 4 years agokonabunnyMember
but why not come back and do your old job for nothing?”
Just as a point of order, don’t reservists get daily rates? (I might be very wrong).
I would assume that the idea of being a reservist is far less attractive when there’s a bloody good chance of being called into service and sent somewhere really **** dangerous.Posted 4 years agowreckerMember
Just as a point of order, don’t reservists get daily rates? (I might be very wrong).
You’re quite correct, however the daily rates are very poor (as little as £36 for a private or equiv). The regs get their dayrate over 7 days/week so the comparison is squint. People aren’t going to join for the money; that’s for sure.
I would assume that the idea of being a reservist is far less attractive when there’s a bloody good chance of being called into service and sent somewhere really **** dangerous.
That depends on the individual.Posted 4 years agotonSubscriber
dont know about TA, but i know a hell of a lot of young people are joining the regulars.
my son joined up in march, my daughter goes for selection to Glencorse next week. also 5 lads my son grew up with also are now regulars.
a lot of youngesters have **** all to look forward to job wise in the uk nowadays, and a career in the army is quite achievable for them, with a not to bad wage to boot.
it is easy to be negative and bitter and twisted from behind the keyboard in a nice office…..some kids/people dont have that luxury.Posted 4 years ago
it is easy to be negative and bitter and twisted from behind the keyboard in a nice office…..some kids/people dont have that luxury.
Well, in a thread about the Government’s Army Reserves scheme, the emotions you describe are natural, aren’t they?
1. While my feelings towards the armed forces are pretty equivocal, I’m sure a life in the service is a great opportunity for kids who don’t have the luxuries of choice.
2. The unpopularity of the Afghan war isn’t in dispute, is it?
3. I’m not bitter or twisted and my office isn’t even nice. 😥
So, while we probably won’t agree on the subject, I wish your family every success in their chosen careers.Posted 4 years ago
I think the biggest flaw in the Reserves strategy is that as modern job security vanishes and things like zero hour contracts become more widespread, being a reserve becomes almost impossible. In the old days of jobs for life, unionised big industry, it was possible to be in the TA and have an employer who accepted it. Now you’d just get fired as soon as they called you up.Posted 4 years ago
Ton. I left school when youth unemployment was at its present levels (and yes, it was Thatchers fault!), and was the only one of my close mates who didn’t go into the forces. A couple went in because its what they’d always wanted to do, but in the main its because there were basically no jobs in the decimated Northern towns.
The deal was this – In return for putting your life on the line you got a decent salary, received decent training (which would come in useful when you’ve left the forces), decent pension etc.
But now it seems that, in the case of wanting to staff the army with reservests, this deal has been completely skewed. So that you’ll get very few of the advantages of full time soldiers, but be exposed to exactly the same risks
To me it seems the equivalent of using agency workers instead of full time staff. And judging by the recruitment numbers, I’m not alone.
But good luck to your kids. Some of my mates are still in the mob after 22+ years. They’ve all seen active service, but they all enjoyed their time in, have been all over the world (not necessarily just to kill people) and all got decent training and qualifications (one jammy sod got a full salary while put through university!). The ones who left walked into good jobs when they did.Posted 4 years agowillardMember
Binners, the aim is not to staff the Army with reservists, but to retain a core of, what, 80k full-time professional soldiers and bolster them on ops with an increased number of Reserves. The aim, as far as I can tell, is also for the Reserves to get increased training and to morph into an organisation that can more easily slot into a regular formation when their skills/manpower* is required.
The TA is changing and the name change is, I think, an attempt to reflect that change. The days of going to the TAC for a couple of hours of tarting around with Ptarmigan before heading out for beer are long gone. This is the start of what is hoped to be a better skilled, more highly trained and close-knit Reserve formation.
*dependent on trade.Posted 4 years agohoraMember
Binners its not just your legs potentially though. Its also your parts that can be sheared off. This is bad enough for a professional soldier with the help on offer when they are booted out of the army following injury/money that they’ll have to live on. If you are a reservist what can a reservist expect? Even worse.Posted 4 years agoPimpmaster JazzMember
I was a reserve (East of England Reg, now 3 Royal Anglian) and applied for regs (RAF Regiment – so not technically army, but as near as dammit (or not, depending who you talk to!) as well.
Main reason I’m not in is leg injuries that I can’t seem to shift (compartment syndrome / shinsplints / whatever you want to call it) that appeared while doing basic training in the reserves.
Why did I want to join? Because I wanted to travel, I wanted to follow the boyhood dream of playing soldiers and I wanted to gain the skills the military offered.
Was I aware of what could happen? Of course. I’m not stupid.
Could I kill someone? I asked myself this before I joined, and while I have no wish to if I needed to I was prepared to.
Why did I leave? Injury aside, I couldn’t give it 100%. It deserves 100% and you get more out than you put in, but you have to be committed. I was at a stage where I was moving house, moving towns and had just moved jobs. I had every intention of going back (hence applying for RAF Reg) but body has said no. I had a love/hate relationship with the military, and it’s an itch annoyingly I’ve never scratched properly.Posted 4 years agoPimpmaster JazzMember
For what it’s worth though, I think Hammond is a **** and the idea of expecting the TA to do the job of the regular army is flawed logic. However well-trained and well-equipped the reserves are, they are still just that – reserves.
And this is before starting on the two bloody aircraft carriers we’re building, using one for spares and overspending on a Harrier replacement. And stop whispering ‘Trident’ at the back!Posted 4 years ago
The topic ‘Any signed up for the Army Reserves?’ is closed to new replies.