Background (skip this if you like)
At a sniff over 6ft, 29 wheels are my natural habitat. Spent many years on steel & Ti rigid 29ers. For a change/laugh I tried one of the OO Fatty’s when they first came out & found them fun, but ultimately not for me. When Sam bought out the Rooster, I dived in figuring the 29+ would be a good ‘inbetween’ platform. I like the Rooster. Its no lightweight, but it climbs anything without having to pick a line and bombs down stuff as fast as I want to descend. The one thing I miss on the Rooster is the flickability through trees & in swoopy singletrack. In tight, fast technical, it tends to just go where it wants, where my 29ers seemed to find their own way while I hung on & pedalled.
I’m no downhiller. I’m an aging rigid XC rider with a few (years old) busted bones that likes a bit more comfort these days. Cant see me doing racing again anytime soon but craving a bit of swoopy fun.
So, my next bike?
Do I try the 27.5+ platform? My thinking is that the 29+ wheels may be the culprit and a tad ‘overkill’, or should I stick to 29+ but try a more engaging riding bike with a shorter CS?
For the 27.5+/29 platform the Travers RussTi is ticking a lot of boxes for the kind of japers I get up to. Trek’s Stache seems to have the 29+ side covered.
What do you think?