Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 158 total)
  • 13 yo daughter and deciding on the hpv vaccine.
  • cinnamon_girl
    Full Member

    Yet if you were ever asked if you wanted mercury injected into your bloodstream the answer should be a resounding no. When it’s in a vaccine though somehow that’s ok. Cognitive dissonance much?

    I shall shortly be having all my amalgam (mercury) fillings removed. Interestingly most other countries banned mercury years ago but the UK is supposed to be withdrawing it (for fillings) in a couple of years.

    Goes without saying that I don’t trust the NHS with my health. 😐

    bencooper
    Free Member

    I trust the NHS a lot more than a private company who makes a profit out of my health.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Vaccines never eradicated any illness!

    I read some of that. It goes on about illnesses not being eradicated, but it does admit that they have been significantly reduced. Surley significant reduction is a good thing?

    When was the last time you knew a kid with polio or smallpox?

    ratherbeintobago
    Full Member

    When was the last time you knew a kid with polio or smallpox?

    IIRC Smallpox is effectively eradicated; last ‘wild’ outbreak was in the early Seventies, and there have been no cases at all in >30 years.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    The article disputes that…

    ratherbeintobago
    Full Member

    The article disputes that…

    I think I’d rather take the WHO’s word for it, on the whole 😛

    nickc
    Full Member

    I shall shortly be having all my amalgam (mercury) fillings removed. Interestingly most other countries banned mercury years ago but the UK is supposed to be withdrawing it (for fillings) in a couple of years.

    really?

    Some European countries have banned it’s use, and that’s mostly because of environmental concerns after it’s been used. In the meantime, there must be literally millions of people worldwide not dropping dead on a daily basis because of their fillings.

    If you must, please please do some “informing of yourself” of the contributory agents of composite filling materials, their sensitivity issues, and their longevity, and check which ones your dentist uses.

    rockhopper70
    Full Member

    we’ve taken the decision to withdraw the consent for now.
    Inactivity is more comfortable that agreeing to it at the moment for all of us.
    If need be, we shall do a lot more research and maybe speak to the GP.
    Then let the GP administer it.

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    we’ve taken the decision to withdraw the consent for now.

    It would be a real shame if anything negative posted on this thread had made you change your minds.

    Go with the science, not the conspiracy theories.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    chipsngravy – Member
    Personally the jury is out on this vaccine, particularly when you see what’s happened in Japan and Spain. I will not be rushing into having my daughter vaccinated.

    IIRC the Spain was suspected to be a ‘bad’ batch, have you banned her from eating chicken in case it’s got Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, E. coli O157:H7, Listeria, or botulism in it, because the vaccine will have been a lot more thoroughly prepared than anything served in a restaurant (or at home). Japan didn’t withdraw it, just suspended mass vaccination (you can still ask for it) but the symptoms weren’t any more severe than the TB jab (numbness, soreness etc arround the injection).

    It would require a HAZMAT team to clean up the mess if the contents of a vaccine fell on a floor. Yet if you were ever asked if you wanted mercury injected into your bloodstream the answer should be a resounding no. When it’s in a vaccine though somehow that’s ok. Cognitive dissonance much?

    *Bangs head on wall* ‘mercury’ was removed from vaccines for one reason, and one reason only. People didn’t like the word mercury. The form it was used in was completely, unequivocally and utterly inert. Unfortunately anti vaccine campaigners have siezed on it as a victory over the government/pharmaceutical companies trying to poision them.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    I really can’t believe that a few postings from some very poorly informed/ignorant people on here have stopped you giving your daughter a potentially lifesaving vaccination

    As someone who’s worked in cancer research for the last 15 plus years its really very depressing

    bencooper
    Free Member

    we’ve taken the decision to withdraw the consent for now.
    Inactivity is more comfortable that agreeing to it at the moment for all of us.
    If need be, we shall do a lot more research and maybe speak to the GP.
    Then let the GP administer it.

    Please do proper research, not Google. Read scientific papers, and work out for yourself the risk you’re taking.

    chipsngravy
    Free Member

    Maybe the guy wants to take his time making a decision that one way or another will impact on his daughter’s life.

    Fair play to the OP for bringing the issue to STW in the first place and even more so for the recent update. I know I wouldn’t have done that. My private life has **** all to do with anyone on STW.

    vickypea
    Free Member

    Reading scientific papers and knowing you’ve looked at a balanced sample of papers and understood them appropriately is not necessarily a good idea without a reasonably good understanding of medicine, science and statistics.
    There’s an advert doing the rounds on Facebook that says “FACT- cancer is a fungus”, and from reading the comments attached to it, I am horrified at the number of people who believe that to be true and when challenged they tell you they’ve “done a lot of research and are well informed”.

    As for “natural treatments” some of them are toxic, for example butterbur was banned because it causes liver toxicity. “Natural” does not necessarily mean ‘safe and effective’. Also, many pharmaceuticals are based on natural substances, so distinguishing the 2 isn’t so simple.

    rockhopper70
    Full Member

    It’s not put off…perhaps on hold until we satisfy ourselves more.
    It was a bit last minute with not a great deal of notice from the school about their intentions.

    cinnamon_girl
    Full Member

    I’ve finally got round to reading Bad Science, and just finished it yesterday.

    You don’t seriously think Ben Goldacre would bite the hand that feeds him?

    cinnamon_girl
    Full Member

    Some European countries have banned it’s use, and that’s mostly because of environmental concerns after it’s been used. In the meantime, there must be literally millions of people worldwide not dropping dead on a daily basis because of their fillings.

    If you must, please please do some “informing of yourself” of the contributory agents of composite filling materials, their sensitivity issues, and their longevity, and check which ones your dentist uses.

    Nick – this was obviously a tough decision to make but I’ve had 4 years of rubbish health. Many people with my (permanent) condition get better. Also, as I’m sure you know, it’s a specialist job to remove them so have done my research. 🙂

    AdamW
    Free Member

    A number of people on here are keasea and I claim multiple £5s!

    vickypea
    Free Member

    Ben Goldacre actively hates the pharmaceutical industry, describing using terms such as “evil”, to the point that I think he is clouding his own judgement. However, he does write very well on the merits of evidence from properly designed and conducted clinical trials.
    I am not saying whether anyone should or should not have their child vaccinated, it’s none of my business, but beware of people who claim to be informed when they may not actually be either appropriately informed or qualified.

    crankboy
    Free Member

    Ben Goldacre is pretty wideranging in the hands he bites and is really happy to explain and justify his reasoning. I would trust him over the “truther girls” and the opinion piece in the new scientist linked above which was pretty comprehensively rebutted in the comments section .

    OP you do need to be confident in your decision talk to your GP and read the NHS information .

    AdamW
    Free Member

    *googles Ben Goldacre hating pharmaceutical industry*

    Nope, can’t find it. Can you post a link please? I see that he wants to fix the industry: http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/bad-pharma-a-manifesto-to-fix-the-pharmaceutical-industry/ and is positively anal about having data to back claims (that’s why he is behind alltrials.org). But he hates people pulling things out of thin air such as anti-vaxxers and woo-merchants, though he would change his view if given hard evidence.

    chewkw
    Free Member

    I have avoided flu jab but one of colleague is addicted to it so demands getting one every year. Coz it’s free according to him … 🙄

    vickypea
    Free Member

    AdamW- I can certainly find you some quotes from Ben Goldacre relating to the pharma industry, when I get home later tonight.
    I’m pretty sure they are in his book Bad Science. He has also make such comments on Facebook.

    theflatboy
    Free Member

    I can assure you, having just read Bad Pharma and Bad Science, that at no point in either does he profess to hate the pharma industry.

    vickypea
    Free Member

    For a start Ben Golacre has written a book called “Bad Pharma: how drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients”. I haven’t read this one, but I do know that in Bad Science he has made sweeping statements that are not true across the board in the industry.

    theflatboy
    Free Member

    Ben Golacre has written a book called “Bad Pharma: how drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients”. I haven’t read this one

    It’s good; perhaps you should.

    And, such as?

    ratherbeintobago
    Full Member

    I have avoided flu jab but one of colleague is addicted to it so demands getting one every year. Coz it’s free according to him

    That’s not a good reason. Avoiding ending up on ECMO, now that’s a good reason.

    vickypea
    Free Member

    theflatboy – I have read large excerpts from that book and I have also read Bad Science twice. I am not defending the pharmaceutical industry, and I am sure that not all big pharma companies are totally inncocent of bad practice. However, what I cannot tolerate is people like Ben Goldacre making sweeping statements, giving the impression that everything he claims is fact and applies to all medicines developed in all pharmaceutical companies. Take Chapter 11 of Bad Science where he suggests that pharmaceutical companies are all out there manipulating their statistical analyses inappropriately to rig the results. I can’t claim that has never happened any more than he can claim that it happens frequently, or most of the time.
    I am unusual in experiencing particularly bad side effects from almost all medicines that I have ever been prescribed, but that doesn’t mean I can’t see that many medications make a big differece to people’s lives and they haven’t all been developed by evil people.

    AdamW
    Free Member

    Vicky – all the more to be behind the ‘alltrials.org’ system where *all* trials, good and bad, all those dropped and left dangling are all registered and their data, good and bad is open for all to see. Full transparency is the key. The natural competitiveness of the industry will then keep everyone on their toes.

    And hopefully if that happens the shyster Burzynski can be forced to give his ‘results’ for anti-neoplastons. 😀

    Goldacre can point to evidence where falsifying clinical data has occurred, and you can never claim something didn’t happen as it would be trying to prove a negative. Best get all data out.

    I have a copy of Bad Science – which focuses on unscientific reportage in all areas of life – and I’ll re-read Chapter 11. I find it hard to believe that he would state *all* companies would do that, as it is not very scientific and he’s particularly anal about that stuff. More likely he would say ‘many’ or a similar phrase. You’ll never get a true scientist to give a 100% guarantee of anything. But I’ll re-read it as you may be correct (see? I’m a scientist by training too…)

    cyve
    Free Member

    Don’t decide not to let your daughter have the HPV vaccine on the strength of what you found on Google. Or if you are swayed by Google then include this blog by a cancer surgeon who gets very angry the antivaccine conspiracy theorists (amongst others): http://scienceblogs.com/?s=Hpv

    Because of the vaccine future cases of cervical cancer could be much reduced but not if people don’t have it. Don’t forget that it’s vaccination that eradicated polio, diphtheria and has almost eradicated tetanus in the UK, amongst others, and it’s a tragedy that a combination of anti-Western propaganda and Western anti-vaccination groups have prevented the WHO from achieving the aim of eradicating polio worldwide (it’s endemic in Afghanistan, Nigeria and Pakistan). We’ve forgotten how awful these communicable diseases are but if you need a reminder about polio you could do worse than listen to the samples here http://www.allmusic.com/album/the-body-blow-mw0000243699.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    I would happily take natural treatments. die

    FTFY.

    Don’t decide not to let your daughter have the HPV vaccine on the strength of what you found on Google.

    This.

    Drac
    Full Member

    I would happily take natural treatments.

    Ah yes the natural treatments. Over the years I’ve picked up several people taking natural treatments and giving their kids natural treatment, “We don’t believe in medicines” is the common phrase they use.

    “Well I can make that severe pain you’re in go away in seconds are you can suffer in pain, the choice is yours but I do have a duty of care to look after you which will it be?”

    Funny they all decide to take the pain relief.

    “I’ve tried homeopathic medicines but he’s not got any better”

    “Has he got worse or has his breathing been this bad for the last few days and have managed to control his temp?”

    “No, he’s got worse the last few hours and his temp has been getting higher”

    “Well it’s your child and your choice but I do have a duty of care for this child, I can make him well by given him a few simple meds or I can document you choice to refuse you sign it and we continue to leave him untreat”

    “Oooh he is much better what did you say you gave him again”

    “Calpol”

    monksie
    Free Member

    Drac. I hate it when people do this but I’ll have to do it…genuine lol 🙂

    theflatboy
    Free Member

    vickypea – Member

    that doesn’t mean I can’t see that many medications make a big differece to people’s lives and they haven’t all been developed by evil people.

    That sentiment is basically continually flagged up through the entirety of Bad Pharma (and the relevant parts of Bad Science). You really should read it.

    Stoatsbrother
    Free Member

    Just because some drug companies behave like rapacious capitalists, and that they limit access to information about the problems with their products doesn’t mean all their products are bad or harmful.

    It never ceases to amaze me:

    1) How many people think “natural” is automatically good. Arsenic and shit are “natural”. Everything non-natural is not part of a conspiracy.

    2) How people would rather their child had a 1:10,000 chance of something really bad happening to them by taking no action/having no vaccine than a 1:1,000,000 chance of something bad happening by taking a decision to have a treatment/vaccine.

    3) How people who believe in a “holistic” approach, rarely consider that their problems might be due to emotional or psychological issues. That their holism applies to treatments… not causes…

    OP – please think again. I have seen enough cervical cancer to know it isn’t nice.

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    This is worth a watch
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01f51s5 – Pain Puss & Poison and the evolution of modern healthcare.

    pondo
    Full Member

    I do know that in Bad Science he has made sweeping statements that are not true across the board in the industry.

    I really don’t think he has, you know.

    pondo
    Full Member

    Interestingly, I’ve found a Ben Goldacre blog about the Express’s reporting on cervical cancer vaccines –

    http://www.badscience.net/2009/10/jabs-as-bad-as-the-cancer/#more-1374

    And it seems to me that, while he is critical of the coverage (and explains why), he makes no sweeping statements about the medical industry as a whole. I must say (and not to labour the point) that I have read Bad Science, and I remember it as being very evidence-led and singularly lacking in sweeping statements. I’ll give it another go, though – it’s a good book.

    theflatboy
    Free Member

    He did making a sweeping statement about me and my wife in Bad Science – he accurately lumped us in as “trendy MMR-dodging north London middle class humanities graduate couple with children”, which luckily we didn’t end up actually becoming (6 out of 7 isn’t bad though… ok, 5 out of 7).

    If I’d read Bad Science while my wife was pregnant it would have been quite instructive in helping us pick out the wood from the trees a little earlier.

    I_did_dab
    Free Member

    I am a cancer researcher and remember seeing the original HPV story unfold – you should see what it does to monkeys 8O.
    A friend, and mother to three children the same age as ours, has just had major surgery to remove a cervical cancer that wasn’t detected by regular screening. It’s not something to take lightly.
    No surprise then that my daughter will have it, and if possible, my son will as well.

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 158 total)

The topic ‘13 yo daughter and deciding on the hpv vaccine.’ is closed to new replies.