Virtual Paedophiles - Chat Forum https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/ Singletrack World Magazine Forum. Come for the bikes, stay for the boll**ks en-GB Sat, 04 Apr 2026 19:40:37 +0000 wpForo 60 Re: Virtual Paedophiles https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12875606 Sat, 01 Jul 2023 18:25:26 +0000 The whole spanking fetish seems to be based around abusive adult/child experiences According to who?
Porn made by consenting adults is apparently “fine”
According to who?
but we know some of the “actors” in those scenes were abused as children. It’s not OK to abuse children so why is it OK to carry on abusing them once they turn 18?
Who says they are continuing to be abused?
If AI generated images are the methodone does banning them actually just increase demand for the “real” stuff and do more harm?
You have that the wrong way round. Methodone gets given to existing addicts to get them and doesn't allow them to quit since its more addictive than the drug it's replacing.]]> Chat Forum squirrelking https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12875606 Re: Virtual Paedophiles https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12875347 Sat, 01 Jul 2023 13:47:15 +0000 Chat Forum ernielynch https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12875347 Re: Virtual Paedophiles https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12875335 Sat, 01 Jul 2023 13:34:07 +0000 Chat Forum ernielynch https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12875335 Re: Virtual Paedophiles https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12875204 Sat, 01 Jul 2023 11:18:06 +0000 it might shock you to learn that until 1992, a certain well known red-top tabloid regularly published pictures of girls aged under eighteen on it’s third page Worse still, they had a countdown for Samantha Fox who was 15, for her 16th birthday, when they could legally publish pics of her topless. Think that was the Sun. They were publishing pics of her in a tight top, low cut even though she was 15 at the time. Exceedingly seedy.]]> Chat Forum dyna-ti https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12875204 Re: Virtual Paedophiles https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12875191 Sat, 01 Jul 2023 11:05:45 +0000 Chat Forum roverpig https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12875191 Re: Virtual Paedophiles https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12873943 Fri, 30 Jun 2023 08:10:24 +0000 Sam Fox would not titillate a paedophile. Think about it. I wouldn't know that, and thinking about it won't help. But a comment was made earlier on this thread that apparently the appeal Sam Fox had, when she was 16 and was conned into having her breasts photographed for publication, was that she had the face of a child but the body of a woman, apparently according to the photographer.]]> Chat Forum ernielynch https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12873943 Re: Virtual Paedophiles https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12873935 Fri, 30 Jun 2023 08:04:03 +0000 I think the further we can get away from sexualising very young girls the better. Yep, and a LONG way to go on that.   Still not a paedophilia issue to me though as that is very different.]]> Chat Forum kerley https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12873935 Re: Virtual Paedophiles https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12873928 Fri, 30 Jun 2023 07:55:37 +0000 Did it titillate paedophiles like Gary Glitter and Jimmy Savile? Very likely I would have thought. Sam Fox would not titillate a paedophile. Think about it. The world has changed its outlook massively in my 54 years on the planet. Topless pictures of 16 year olds and teachers having relationships with 6th formers are now, quite rightly, illegal. But these are social constructs. The age of consent, iirc, didn’t exist before the Victorians, and other countries have different laws around that to us. Over the years I've known* women who have modeled from Page 3 level to hardcore. All of them were responsible over 18s at when they made their choices. *not in the biblical sense.
I think the further we can get away from sexualising very young girls the better.
Definitely this. And some sports and dance groups need to think very carefully how they expect girls/women to dress and act.]]> Chat Forum MoreCashThanDash https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12873928 Re: Virtual Paedophiles https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12873874 Fri, 30 Jun 2023 05:59:16 +0000 What will it be in the future, 21 and would that appear a bit silly to you today (it would to me). Depends what you're talking about. If you're talking about the age of consent then that's obviously a very complex subject and has many factors such as the age difference, if one person is in a position of authority, etc.  It's pretty much impossible to boil down to a single number but we do it anyway. If you're talking about appearing topless in a national newspaper or on a website then maybe raising the age to 21 wouldn't be such a bad idea. Or possibly change the definition so that models have to 'look' at least 25.  Obviously that's open to interpretation but it's a policy that's used some places when buying alcohol.  'If we think you look under 25 you will be asked for id.' I think the further we can get away from sexualising very young girls the better.]]> Chat Forum BruceWee https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12873874 Re: Virtual Paedophiles https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12873870 Fri, 30 Jun 2023 05:46:56 +0000 Chat Forum kerley https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/virtual-paedophiles/#post-12873870