British Cycling agrees 8-year sponsorship with Shell

by 220


British Cycling has signed a long-term partnership that will bring wide-ranging support and investment from Shell UK as a new Official Partner. The agreement starts this month and runs to the end of 2030.

This new partnership will see a shared commitment to; supporting Great Britain’s cyclists and para-cyclists through the sharing of world-class innovation and expertise; accelerating British Cycling’s path to net zero; and helping more – and wider groups of – people to ride, including ways to make cycling more accessible for disabled people.

The partnership fits with British Cycling’s wider ambition to work with a broader range of commercial partners to support the delivery of the organisation’s strategy, ‘Lead Our Sport, Inspire Our Communities’.

Brian Facer, CEO of British Cycling, said:

“We’re looking forward to working alongside Shell UK over the rest of this decade to widen access to the sport, support our elite riders and help our organisation and sport take important steps towards net zero – things we know our members are incredibly passionate about.

“Within our new commercial programme, this partnership with Shell UK brings powerful support for cycling, will help us to improve and will make more people consider cycling and cyclists.”

David Bunch, Shell UK Country Chair, said:

“We’re very proud to become an Official Partner to British Cycling. The partnership reflects the shared ambitions of Shell UK and British Cycling to get to net zero in the UK as well as encouraging low and zero-carbon forms of transport such as cycling and electric vehicles.

“Working together we can deliver real change for people right across the country, from different walks of life, and also apply Shell’s world-leading lubricant technology to support the Great Britain Cycling Team in their quest for gold at the 2024 Paris Olympic and Paralympic Games.” 


Latest Stories


Darren Henry, British Cycling Commercial Director, said:

“At British Cycling we have a strong track record of working with our partners to enhance our work, have a real impact in communities and elevate the role that cycling plays in the thinking and actions of UK businesses.

“The partnership also shows our fresh commercial approach at British Cycling, as we look to work alongside a broader range and number of partners to help us to deliver our strategy and support the long-term growth of cycling and the sport across Britain.”

The agreement includes specific investment from Shell UK to support a new programme – to be named Limitless – which aims to break down the barriers disabled people face when accessing cycling.

The ambition is to embed disability and para sport into the heart of communities and develop a clear pathway from local to elite performance, with the funding helping to create inclusive and accessible environments for disabled riders across British Cycling’s 2,000 registered clubs. The programme will be launched, and further details on how to access the funding made available, by the end of the year.

Shell, which has set five ambitions for 2030 to bolster energy security and help the UK towards net zero, will also support British Cycling through steps such as helping to support British Cycling’s transition to an electric-vehicle fleet. Shell already runs the UK’s largest public-charging network with access to more than 10,000 charging points.

This press release from British Cycling will no doubt raise a few eyebrows. Big energy and cycling? Is this greenwashing? But, on the flip side, has anyone minded the Mercedes Benz sponsorship of the World Cup? Big auto and cycling hardly seems like a likely alignment of values. As British riders, if we want to race anything other than enduro we almost always have to have some affiliation with British Cycling – even if it’s only an extra pound or so on an entry fee to cover a day license. There’s little ‘consumer choice’. Does this announcement affect your perspective on British Cycling membership? Head to the comments, and take our poll.


Author Profile Picture
Hannah Dobson

Managing Editor

I came to Singletrack having decided there must be more to life than meetings. I like all bikes, but especially unusual ones. More than bikes, I like what bikes do. I think that they link people and places; that cycling creates a connection between us and our environment; bikes create communities; deliver freedom; bring joy; and improve fitness. They're environmentally friendly and create friendly environments. I try to write about all these things in the hope that others might discover the joy of bikes too.

More posts from Hannah

Viewing 40 posts - 161 through 200 (of 220 total)
  • British Cycling agrees 8-year sponsorship with Shell
  • crazy-legs
    Full Member

    other than the fact that electric vehicles would been shown up for being completely inappropriate for the task in hand

    Basically that. Nowhere close to the range and the charging infrastructure is not in place to cope with something like Tour of Britain landing in town and needing dozens of fast chargers.

    convert
    Full Member

    Does anyone know how to cancel a membership of BC? I’m a member of both BC and UK Cycling and this deal is crap.

    Aside from just letting it lapse, if you want an instant cancellation it would be an email to membership@britishcycling.org.uk or a call to 0161 274 2010

    chrismac
    Full Member

    part of which might be not associating cycling (part of the solution) with Shell (part of the problem).

    Cycling as a sport or hobby is no more part of the solution than Shell is. Both sell products based on oil or other minerals dug out of the ground. Both spend a large amount of cash encouraging you to buy more of their products, with cycling  virtually all are never actually needed.

    If you are commuting by bike and genuinely relocating car moments with a bike then great and that will help but as a hobby or sport cycling has no green credentials

    Mark
    Full Member

    Skoda sponsored the TDF this year and provided a limited number of electric cars including a full EV Octavia to the Commissaire which was used on 15 of the 21 stages.

    munrobiker
    Free Member

    If you are commuting by bike and genuinely relocating car moments with a bike then great and that will help but as a hobby or sport cycling has no green credentials

    Unfortunately, the general public don’t see the difference- all people on bikes are cyclists, and cycling is pushed as green. Shell using British Cycling to seem like they’re green and doing good things for the environment is a bad thing. It’s essentially using British Cycling and cycling as a sport AND a mode of transport to give Shell a good public image to hide behind while they fail to meet their environmental responsibilities by not working toward net zero or shifting their focus from oil to alternative power.

    ayjaydoubleyou
    Full Member

    I have often wondered why electric vehicle producers dont sponsor cycling. It would make a lot of sense, other than the fact that electric vehicles would been shown up for being completely inappropriate for the task in hand

    ~200km at 25-30 mph should be well within the range of most modern big EVs – the sort of size used as team/support cars anyway. an 80kWh skoda would fully charge in 12 hours on a 7.4kW charger

    tazzymtb
    Full Member

    whilst the optics of the deal are pretty crap, I can’t as a mad keen cyclist get on my high horse about petrochemical companies seeing as pretty much every part of cycling is reliant on the hydrocarbons and polymers from crude oil.

    It takes litres of oil for each tire manufactured and If I look at the mountain of rubber in my workshop and on my bikes, then I may as well kick a seal puppy in face now.

    Never mind the plastics and resins in brake compounds, cables, hydraulic oils, cable coatings, foams for grips, saddles, helmets, elastane/lycra in cycle clothing, carbon fibre is wholly reliant on oil and then we have the use in the energy utilised to mine, manufacture and ship the ores and then transport our bikes all over the world via big old polluting cargo ships.

    if we move to net Zero use of oil as a fuel source, we still need vast quantities of oil and the environmental damage that it entails from extraction through to refining for every single part of our lives.

    So whilst Shell are a bunch of ********* as are all large corporations, if you look at it logically rather than emotionally there is no environmental reason to have a hissy fit.

    tpbiker
    Free Member

    Whilst I disagree in principle with this decision, If I had the choice to simply cancel my membership I would. Bc provide zero benefit for the vast majority of cyclists

    Unfortunately however, if I want to race I need to pay bc, and given this announcement, that irks me somewhat

    Blackflag
    Free Member

    Regardless of the fact that many of us drive cars and are still dependent on fossil fuels for the products we all consume, the issue that Shell actively lobby to slow down climate change action (see many links shared earlier in this thread) should be sufficient to consider them an unsuitable partner to enable british cycling to get to net zero.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    ‘virtue signalling’ is a bullshit phrase. It often just signifies a weak position in a discussion.

    Not necessarily. You can be vacuously virtue signalling, but people can also mis-use the term to denigrate any discussion of doing something better.

    Whereas this decision by BC sticks two fingers up to our efforts

    I remain unconvinced of that.

    ransos
    Free Member

    Cycling as a sport or hobby is no more part of the solution than Shell is

    It doesn’t matter. This is a sponsorship deal, which Shell hopes will reflect on it favourably through being associated with something perceived as healthy and sustainable. That’s your virtue signalling, right there.

    john_l
    Free Member

    Unfortunately however, if I want to race I need to pay bc, and given this announcement, that irks me somewhat

    Only if you need points, which obviously you might, otherwise just pay the extra couple of quid on each entry for a temporary license.

    Was thinking about whether it was worth renewing my membership at £86 when it comes round in Jan. This has made it a much easier decision!

    littlerob
    Full Member

    I was already wavering about my BC membership, in that I think CUK supports a style of cycling more relevant to what I do, then the nonsense with the Queen, and now this.

    I have emailed them and asked them not to renew my membership (though somewhat predictably this was only just renewed automatically).

    FunkyDunc
    Free Member

    ~200km at 25-30 mph should be well within the range of most modern big EVs – the sort of size used as team/support cars anyway. an 80kWh skoda would fully charge in 12 hours on a 7.4kW charger

    not with all the windows open, bikes on the roof, alpine passes, constant periods of hard acceleration.

    and then they get to the hotel at the end of the day and some selfish sod has taken the one charging point

    cycling isn’t green, most bikes are made of plastic

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    ~200km at 25-30 mph should be well within the range of most modern big EVs – the sort of size used as team/support cars anyway. an 80kWh skoda would fully charge in 12 hours on a 7.4kW charger

    As @FunkyDunc says above ^^, it’s more than that.
    Plus you’re talking about the range as the length of a stage but it’ll be far more. Transfer from hotel to stage start (could be 100km easily), the stage itself and then the drive to the hotel (which again could easily be another 100km). If it’s a long transfer, it could be 400km.

    The charging infrastructure in most countries is not well enough developed to be using a full fleet of EVs – in a road race scenario (even at Tour of Britain level), there are dozens of cars that would need charging. Multiply that up to TdF level and it’s hundreds of cars.

    The recent Cycling Weekly article about “making cycle racing greener” was mostly a load of bollocks – stuff about how they could use drones instead of gas guzzling helicopters. Well yes, they could except to get uninterrupted drone coverage of a 200km stage, you’d need hundreds of drones and operators (presumably all travelling in cars…) to cover it all. Not exactly any greener, in fact more of a logistical nightmare. Same with EVs, the idea that all teams could immediately switch to EV estate cars is just not realistic.

    FB-ATB
    Full Member

    Maybe Shell base their sponsorship on the tactical nous of the partner, given they are linked to Ferrari in F1!

    jameso
    Full Member

    Chris,

    Completely disagree. I really don’t care what others think about the car I drive out the watch I wear or the music I listen to. I make purchases because I want the item.

    Same here, at least that’s what I believe. We signal to others in most things we do I think, signalling is communication etc. Protest moves often get called virtue signalling, a protest move is the same thought process as why I don’t drive a new BMW. I don’t because I DGAS about cars and I have an issue with thew car industry in general, a rejection of consumerist and transport norms which some would call virtue signalling. Maybe it is – does someone know enough about what else I do or don’t do to say whether it’s legit or fake for appearance, signalling?

    It’s a phrase that’s so often used when those motives are assumed or projected by those accusing someone of virtue signalling, as a way to rubbish their action. In that case it’s a BS term. An easy dig i/o asking better questions.

    You can be vacuously virtue signalling, but people can also mis-use the term to denigrate any discussion of doing something better.

    You could be, though generally how would someone know it was vacuous (assuming it’s online)? Unlikely they would, it’s a projected thing most of the time the phrase is used – as you say, to denigrate.

    Regardless of the fact that many of us drive cars and are still dependent on fossil fuels for the products we all consume, the issue that Shell actively lobby to slow down climate change action (see many links shared earlier in this thread) should be sufficient to consider them an unsuitable partner to enable british cycling to get to net zero.

    +1. Exactly that, the scale and power of oil co influence that’s put us here when we could be somewhere better by now.

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    So basically the consensus is we just shouldn’t aspire to be better.

    Brilliant.

    shermer75
    Free Member

    A lot of people leaving British Cycling

    molgrips
    Free Member

    You could be, though generally how would someone know it was vacuous (assuming it’s online)?

    Because everyone online is always acting in the worst possible way. Everyone knows this! 😉

    mini
    Free Member

    For any BC MTB coaches, i am sure we can arrange a reciprocal agreement with MIAS to convert your qualifications to MIAS.

    jimthesaint
    Full Member

    For anyone saying that if you’ve ever owned anything made of plastic, or have ever sat in a car you’re a hypocrite for calling out this deal then you’re missing the point. A lot of people have issue with this sponsorship not because it’s a petro-chem company but because it’s Shell specifically.
    I defy anybody to do the tiniest bit of research into Shell and not come away thinking ‘Christ, they’re full on Bond villains’. The amount of information available stating how despicable they are is astounding. Amnesty International have accused them of murder!

    molgrips
    Free Member

    The amount of information available stating how despicable they are is astounding. Amnesty International have accused them of murder!

    Well that’s a good comment but most of what was posted when I asked was just insinuation, or the sort of thing that any company does but painted in an evil light.

    ooOOoo
    Free Member

    So Shell get to sponsor British Cycling for 8 years.
    Yet Shell never show an oil rig in their adverts.

    What a crock of absolute bollocks.

    I thought a road cycling team being sponsored by a 4×4 manufacturer was as shameless as it could get…

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    From Shell’s perspective it’s a fantastic “partnership” a perceived “green wash” and a “Sports wash” in one.

    The thing is I do wonder how much BC really needs a corporate sponsor sometimes, membership subs + race/event fees plus various lottery and government sources of money for development of the sport (as measured by Olympic medals mostly) for an organisation that gets a lot from a volunteer labour force. Do they really need Oil money too?

    I’d also be interested to know how much, if any, discussion is had about the reaction to the shell sponsorship at their national council meeting in a few weeks…

    kimbers
    Full Member

    if we move to net Zero use of oil as a fuel source, we still need vast quantities of oil and the environmental damage that it entails from extraction through to refining for every single part of our lives.

    Net zero is a target because fossil fuels are burnt, not because they are extracted & refined

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    The thing is I do wonder how much BC really needs a corporate sponsor sometimes, membership subs + race/event fees plus various lottery and government sources of money for development of the sport (as measured by Olympic medals mostly) for an organisation that gets a lot from a volunteer labour force. Do they really need Oil money too?

    Membership money doesn’t come close to covering it.
    Event fees is mostly insurance related, BC gets very little actual revenue from events – in fact at grassroots level, events are not a big money spinner unless you’re doing 1000+ rider Sportives regularly. Cycle clubs promoting a road race will make maybe £200 for club funds at most.

    All the “other” stuff – coaching, Go-Ride, training of event officials, clothing, race equipment and the day to day running of the back-room elements all adds up.

    There are actually only a few companies who can come up with the required millions per year over a 4 or 8 year deal, you’re looking at the top end corporate stuff (like Sky and HSBC before).

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    Perhaps, but it’s not like BC is meant to be a profit making organisation, and just how much do they get bunged via ‘culture and sport’ and lottery funds? It’s all rather opaque IMO and the focus is almost always elite competition. Grass roots seems to be taken care of mainly by the local clubs (putting on events, finding Marshalls, etc)…

    Does shell align with BC’s espoused values? I don’t really think it does myself…

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Perhaps, but it’s not like BC is meant to be a profit making organisation, and just how much do they get bunged via ‘culture and sport’ and lottery funds? It’s all rather opaque IMO

    You can see here. Do remember there are a couple of subsidiary companies too.
    Membership is pretty sizeable – equal to what HSBC and other sponsors put in it seems.

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03943494/filing-history

    I *assumed* they were a charity, but it appears not to be the case.

    mattsccm
    Free Member

    Any of you smarty pants got a better idea?
    Doubt it, you’all be too busy signing from the same hypocritical hymnsheet.

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    Hypocritical how? Most of us are trying to do better and that’s what this is about. This isn’t better by a long shot, it’s not even the status quo.

    Or is it only the ideologically pure who can criticise?

    franksinatra
    Full Member

    Interesting watching track world cup, GB team all got Shell logo on their kits. In the womens team sprint the last rider wasn’t wearing the logo. Do you think this is due to timescales and not getting kit in time or some kind of protest?

    stevious
    Full Member

    I’ve just emailed to cancel.

    I optimistically had a look to see if this was tied to any meaningful commitments on the part of Shell but I can’t see any. I can’t in good conscience support greenwashing like this.

    I’m aware that I’m not perfect and this action won’t make much change but it’s not nothing and it’s something I can do.

    ooOOoo
    Free Member

    Good work.

    First page of Shell’s annual report 2020:

    “Shell is an international energy company engaged in the principal aspects of the oil and gas industry and reports its business through segments.”

    What on earth does that have to do with cycling.

    irc
    Full Member

    Obviously cycling companies are not falling over themselves to sponsor British Cycling.

    As our society is completely dependent on fossil fuels why is their sponsorship not acceptable?

    Loads of people here criticising Shell while using Shell’s products to power their car and heat their home.

    Why shouldn’t BC take their cash when we are all content to use their products?

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    What on earth does that have to do with cycling.

    Could easily ask the same about HSBC or Sky (other than maybe “cyclists have bank accounts” and “cyclists watch TV”…?)

    BC need a big money sponsor/ partner in order to keep doing what they’re doing, it’s nowhere close to being self-funding.
    I can see that Shell is basically greenwashing but then so is every other fossil fuel company.

    Best you don’t look too closely at the delightful human rights records of some of the countries involved in football or F1…

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    Why shouldn’t BC take their cash when we are all content to use their products?

    Are we? That argument has already been made and debunked by the fact most of us have little choice, dependence is not the same as acceptance.

    Give me the means and I’ll gladly dump fossil fuels and personal transport.

    monkeyboyjc
    Full Member

    dazzydw
    Free Member

    BC’s latest update doesn’t help much.
    They’re going to make cycling more accessible. – Not without grassroots support they’re not.
    They’re going to recruit a Sustainability Manager. – I hope they like working with Shell’s sustainability department.
    They’re going to inspire more people to ride across Britain. – The only thing they’ve inspired so far is to cancel BC membership.

    My mate has now quit her role as Breeze ride leader, which she had been doing an amazing job of. This is so sad.
    I’ll wager a number of GoRide coaches are gone soon.

    The facts about oil and logic about funding are no match for ethics and values. The collateral damage is starting to look very big indeed.

    I hope it was worth it BC.

    nerd
    Free Member

    Here’s the (unsatisfactory) reply to my email cancelling my BC membership.
    For the record, I don’t own a car and I pay for renewable energy (Ecotricity).

    Dear Neil,

    Thank you for getting in touch with us.

    The Shell partnership is a long-term commitment to cycling, which will bring significant and tangible benefits and help more people consider cycling and cyclists.

    It will help us to progress important work to move our business and sport towards net-zero, and to make cycling more accessible for disabled people – matters which we know our members are passionate about.

    We will share further details of the first big steps before the end of this year, including an announcement of the Limitless programme and the recruitment of our first Sustainability Manager.

    As always, all feedback from our members is important, and we’re always seeking to improve our engagement with you. Your comments in relation to your cancellation request have been passed on accordingly.

    We’re sorry that you want to leave British Cycling. If you would like us to process cancellation of your British Cycling membership, please return your card along with a covering note to British Cycling, National Cycling Centre, Stuart Street, Manchester, M11 4DQ. We will process your refund on receipt of your card. Please Note: A cancellation fee of £10 will deducted from any refund issued.

    Best wishes,

    The Membership Team

Viewing 40 posts - 161 through 200 (of 220 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.