I don’t see why accident implies no fault, it means no intent. Oops I dropped a plate by accident. It was my fault, but I didnt’ want to do it. ooops I wet myself, I didn’t intend to but it’s my fault for not controlling it. oops I wrote my car off in a field, I didn’t intend to but I did it, it was my fault.
Any definition I can find does not mention fault.
It doesn’t mean to, the word never implied fault or lack thereof, it implied lack of intent. The definition of chicken doesn’t include “uncooked”.
People need to get a better grasp of English before complaining about “incorrect” use of words methinks. If people use it as a way of absolving themselves of responsibility it is THAT that needs adressing, and the fact that they don’t seem to realise accident!= no fault like many on here. Maybe a better standard of English teaching in schools?
Why are RTAs now called RTCs then?
Poor education and people in control of the wording having to deal with the general public who have a poor understanding of english?
🙂 Smiley face added because this wasn’t intended as stabbing at cynic-al, more of a general observation which just happens to be reflected in online forums. I’m no English expert but before I called for a change of wording I’d check whether my use of the wording was correct and change me if not.