You’re not wrong, but I think robdixon’s point is that people earning between £100,000 and £149,000 are paying a lot more tax then people earning £150,000 and over
No, it’s even more bonkers than that. The marginal rate goes up to 62% between 100k and 118k or so whilst they remove your personal allowance, then back down to 42% until you hit £150k then up to 47%. This is neither progressive nor regressive, it’s just bonkers.
What’s even more silly is that because its been implemented by removing your PA, it’s almost impossible for the PAYE system to get your tax right, because your tax code becomes dependent on how much you earn, making the tax system even more complicated and difficult to administer. This has been done because the notion of high earners getting a “tax free allowance” is politically unacceptable, even though you could achieve an equivalent effect much more simply by reducing the £150k threshold.
Further, because the £100k and £150k thresholds are seen as the preserve of the “rich”, there’s never any discussion of raising them in line with inflation which means that ever more people will creep into these brackets. Already £100k today is probably equivalent to less than £90k when the change was introduced, and it will continue to affect more and more people, just like the 40% band.
I’ve no problem with higher rates for higher earnings, but it’d be really nice if it could be implemented simply and logically.