nope, Cycleworks.
I found the M109S fast under power but a bit harsh. The T129S was slower (heavier wheels) but more fun in the ST.
Caveats:
* obviously the M109S s a grand more expensive, what with its carbon wheels, and it didn’t have a dropper
* the M109S had skinny mud tyres (looked to be about 2.0), and I didn’t check the pressures but I bet they were rock hard, that’s not how I would ride it
* the T192S was about right for me, as a counterpoint to my rigid SS 29er. I dropped the tyre pressure quite a bit from when it was given to me.
The loop was about 4 miles on trails I know very well. (Holmbury Hill, Park Life then Telegraph). Not a long test so all my impressions must be taken with a grain of salt.
The bike I wanted to want was the M109S, but I came away thinking the T192S was more my bag, for what I’m looking for. How much of that was down to the M109S tyres and pressures was hard to say. On my SS I run 2.25 Schwalbes, pretty damn soft.
I can’t help thinking if I was going to drop 3 grand on XC bling, I’d go carbon HT with all the trimmings, not alloy FS.