the notoriously known "britain's hardest criminal".
i remember watching a documentary about him (having never heard of him before) a while ago,then recently there was a film about him on film 4.
there's no denying he was a dangerous man,BUT is he deserving of being in solitary confinement for over 35 years!
there are people (use the term loosely) who have actually murdered/raped and got a very short sentance/released compared to charles bronson.
why has he got this unjust reputation as britain's most dangerous man?
just wondering on what you think about it?
video is an interview with charles on his view about being moved to a new prison *(does contain strong/offensive language)