Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • We accept this was never a case with an intention to kill
  • Mister-P
    Free Member

    So when he threw a bottle at someone what was his intention?

    Barmaid killed

    uplink
    Free Member

    To hurt him?

    BigDummy
    Free Member

    This is why we have an offence of manslaughter (carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment) and an offence of murder (currently) carrying a mandatory life sentence. He didn’t mean to kill her. It was however a predictable consequence of his acting like a dick. Manslughter is appropriate and he will serve quite a while in prison.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    ditto, he threw a bottle into a crowded bar, it smashed and someone died as a result, a completely stupid thing to do, but he didn’t intend to kill anyone.

    kevonakona
    Free Member

    as above

    RudeBoy
    Free Member

    Case closed.

    Gary_M
    Free Member

    Yep, very stupid thing to do. But clearly he didn’t intend to kill anyone.

    coffeeking
    Free Member

    Jeeze the kangaroo court has formed, adjudicated and disbanded before I got chance to wave my gavel. Damn!

    Stoner
    Free Member

    coffeking, you could always move for appeal.

    there’s always more mileage to be made out of the STW judiciary system. And vast fees too. Vast fees.

    Coyote
    Free Member

    Idiot? Yes.
    Murderer? No.
    Should he get a very long sentence? Of course. A woman died as a direct result of his actions.

    coffeeking
    Free Member

    Too late ‘yote, the hammer has fallen – yer yellin at the back of the prison van as it leaves 😉

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

The topic ‘We accept this was never a case with an intention to kill’ is closed to new replies.