What’s wrong with lock down features on forks? Marzochhi used to do it, I thought it was great. So long as the fork bridge can take the strain of that rope, that’s the only worry for me.
It messes with the geometry.
Say a 72deg SA is the optimum for producing the most power, so you design the bike around it, a 66 HA, and a 160mm fork.
Then you want a 70deg HA for climbs, so you lock down the fork to about 60mm, but this punts the seat angle to 76deg, steeper than even a TT bike, but without the benefit of elbow rests, Marzocchi ETA and MCR were even more extreme dropping to about 20mm.
It’s always going to be a compromise but I find that the systems that rely on the damping far more effective than adjustable travel, motion control etc keep the fork around it’s sag point (rather than locked out or locked down) much better for climbing as they keep the important bit (you and your legs) in the right position, a wandering front wheel you can compensate for.