Good on you for getting involved, and for reporting back to keep the discussion going. As noted above, even boilerplate letters are better than nothing. The more people making a noise, the louder the noise.
I got a broadly similar reply from my MP, albeit much shorter, having been phrased as “you’ll be aware of the great stuff we’ve done” (not especially) rather than actually pointing it out. A little disappointing as I’d asked four reasonably specific and carefully bullet-pointed questions in the hope of encouraging a proper response. Hey ho.
It’s a bit of a shame that they’re championing a prison sentence as a measure – something I think is misguided, as these incidents are not malicious or premeditated – rather than anything more progressive and preventative. But it’s early days, I suppose.
Sadly my MPS is also a PPS, which means he can’t sign EDMs. But while we’re here, those of you with MPs who can do so could do worse than to ask them to support EDMs 679 and 407.
http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2012-13/679
http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2012-13/407
Interesting point on the DPP, I’ll look into how that avenue might be pursued. I confess to being rather the lay man when it comes to legal processes and the various entities involved.
For anyone interested in this stuff, if you’re not already aware, the cross-party parliamentary inquiry starts tomorrow, so there should be some decent noise in the media from some clued-up people. See #getbritaincycling and @allpartycycling.
Additional related wordguffs at stewartpratt.com.