Whilst its good advice to take responsibility for your actions and of course it is foolish to be irresponsible with your borrowing.
However there seems to be a theme that if a loophole exists to avoid repaying these debts then it is morally wrong to take it.
As we all know morals are a continuum. What I mean is (and a thread on here recently acted as a rough straw poll) if you are under charged by the tax man and you are confident that the under payment is not traceable, then I suspect many would keep it and sleep easy at night. However I also suspect that very few would agree that stealing money from a pensioner is in any way acceptable or even comparable.
I am not making a judgement here I am just highlighting the disparity, or the example of "differential association".
If we accept this as broadly true then where do credit card companies stand on this moral continuum? Many of the responses indicate that they consider them to be at the "pensioner" end when I would consider them self seeking and rutheless, they prey on the those in society least able to make wise financial decisions as well as being least able to attone for those errors once made.
Why should they be held in high regard morally and why should we feel that those that look for loopholes (which they cant create) shouldnt take advantage of them?