Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 78 total)
  • Tubeless?? Why would I change?? Other guys in the club have done
  • andy5452
    Free Member

    Hi

    Can anyone tell me what the benefit of changing to tubeless is?? Seems expensive to do, but I hear about low pressures, less punctures etc,,.. is that it?? The only reason is less punctures??

    Help Please :O)

    A

    BigJohn
    Full Member

    Great on the back, especially. You can rattle down rocky descents with a vastly reduced risk of a snakebite.

    Also if you're plagued with thorns where you ride.

    andy5452
    Free Member

    Hi BigJohn. I have never run tubeless always Slime tyres with Panaracers, never had a flat no matter where I ride (touch wood) so I really am struggling to see any gain – though the club boys bang on about how good they are

    BigJohn
    Full Member

    I don't notice any difference other than the snakebite thing.

    psychle
    Free Member

    Slime tubes are pretty heavy… so you'll see the same benefits, but lighter, which can only be a good thing? 🙂

    m_t_b
    Free Member

    Better traction with tubeless apparently, I noticed a difference when I made the change about 6 years ago would never go back to tubes now as used to hate having to carry one and then change it whilst riding. Never had a puncture since running tubeless but do so with Joes No Flats or similar. If you want to do it to remove the puncture problem then its worth it, there are other benefits too from my exp.

    phiiiiil
    Full Member

    It's also like having a little bit more suspension, tyres at the same pressure will have a little more "give" in them over lumps and bumps making fora smoother ride.

    Given how cheap ghetto tubeless is I'm convinced. I did it on one bike just to give me something to do out in the garden fettling with bikes, but I've since done it on two bikes and one unicycle – 'tis a much better overall experience than tubes imho.

    dirtbiker100
    Free Member

    anyone selling a rear hope/tubeless wheel?
    I've got a tubeless front wheel and I don't know if its my mental state or the wheel but my last ride on it was bloody fun.

    andy5452
    Free Member

    Cheers fellas, I'll give them ago .. but they are wheel specific , yes?? So I will need either a conversion kit or new wheels??? I prob go for wheels anyones I should take a look at????

    A

    andytherocketeer
    Full Member

    Given how cheap ghetto tubeless is I'm convinced

    What like 10x the price of a tube?

    Take me a minute to fit a tube. Looked at the vids for the Stan's stuff and decided that it looked like way too much faff. €4 for a spare tube to go in the backpack sounds like a better deal to me. Sods law – I'll probably get my 1st flat in over 1000km now.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    What wheels do you have now? May make a difference.

    Tubeless is a bit overhyped IMO, for a lot of people anyway… If you constantly get flats then that's more of a benefit but I'd say that for most folks flats are a rare irritation. Still nice to get rid of that, though of course you can still rip a tubeless tyre. But, I think there's a lot of waffle on the subject. I can't tell any difference in traction, rolling resistance or "suppleness", perhaps there's a difference but comparing 100g of sealant with 100g of tube I can't feel it.

    And an awful lot of people who'll tell you it's lighter have never actually done the maths, my proper tubeless (on stans and traversees) is lighter than a tube, but my ghetto tubeless wasn't. Most times people make comparisons with cheap or DH tubes so you hear "My ghetto tubeless is only 200g, that's half as much as a tube". Or twice as much if you use light tubes.

    "What like 10x the price of a tube?"

    How do you figure that? Ghetto tubeless means buying a BMX tube and a tub of sealant, and possibly a roll of electric tape. A pint of sealant does 4-5 tyres (doing ghetto you'll want a little more than normal in my experience) so that's £2 a go for sealant. £2 for a tesco BMX tube. 50p for tape.

    Not that I recommend it, I was never happy with it on my 717s, but some do.

    duckers
    Free Member

    I've had no punctures since going tubeless using UST rims and UST/TLR/LUST/etc tyres and stans sealant, thats a good enough reason for me.

    Jellybaby
    Free Member

    Tried tubless for a while cos i started riding harder and therefore more punctures (snake bites).It was great but being a novice with them i pulled a thorn out my tyre and it went down – durr brain i know! Only problem is we dont have a compressor so have to go to friends to pump them up. Back to using innertubes now 🙁

    How much are compressors, anyone know where i can get a cheap one from?

    Ecky-Thump
    Free Member

    If you constantly get flats then that's more of a benefit but I'd say that for most folks flats are a rare irritation

    I'd have to agree 100% with Northwind on the first part of that…. and disagree 150% with the second part (from a personal perspective).

    I guess I'm just clumbsy but I'd more often than not pick up a pinch flat on each and every rocky downhill before I went tubeless. None since. 😀
    Only downside is tearing sidewalls instead of pinch flatting so I've now gone for a heavier UST on the back (formerly standard single ply).
    I wouldn't profess to notice any difference in use due to tubeless. I just don't have the pinchflat problem any more.

    Houns
    Full Member

    No punctures in 4 years. Never had a problem with them, easy to inflate, just refresh the fluid every 6 months or so – Running Mavic 819's and UST tyres. Really can't understand why some folks have issues (ok they are trying the 'ghetto' way) They are pretty much fit and forget

    saladdodger
    Free Member

    I went tubeless via the Stans route with my 719 fims and Schwable Nobbby Nick tyres

    First ride out and I had a 1" gash to the sidewall the sealant did slow the air comming out, so I did not suffer a blow out, but back to a tube to get me home

    mickasaki
    Free Member

    I think the main reason to change, and probably the best, is to give people something to talk about whn not riding! I changed because i was bored!

    TrailriderJim
    Free Member

    I fitted UST Nobby Nics to Flow rims and it is the best upgrade I have ever made. Better tyre profile and grip has meant the biggest improvement to my downhill skills ever. Just fitted a shiny pair of 2.2 tubeless Rubber Queens – can't wait to try them.

    buzz-lightyear
    Free Member

    I ghettoed the nevs that came with my bike to overcome frequent puncturing. When it works it works well. Can be frustrating to do tho.

    scottidog
    Free Member

    How much are compressors, anyone know where i can get a cheap one from?

    CO2 cannisters work just as well and are a fraction of the cost.

    I've been running ghetto for a while now after getting 3 snake bites on a single ride. Not had a one since running 30-35 psi and plowing down whatever rocky descents are put in front of me on my hardtail.

    Pawsy_Bear
    Free Member

    Slime tyres with Panaracers

    been there, my bike then had the acceleration of a striking slug.

    Was always tube man. New bike was tubeless so went with the flow. 6 months on would I have changed to tubeless knowing what I know now? Answer yes. And I also know I would not go ghetto or any other half arsed bodge tubeless.

    Advantages? Well most would not go back to tubes. Low pressure, great rolling extra grip and banish punctures?

    Starrman28
    Free Member

    I've really rated the ghetto setup (tesco BMX tubes/Stans)on my 717's, you need to you can run much lower psi than with tubes.
    Not tried a welsh trail centre yet where I've had had snake bites running with tubes but in theory it should be good.

    andy5452
    Free Member

    Thanks for the advice all, I think I'll give them ago, anyone recommend a new boy set of wheels and tyres?? mainly XC riding with some limited technical stuff ia my style.

    Cheers

    Onzadog
    Free Member

    The stans rims on Hope Hoops are great. I like the Flow for it's wide platform and reasonable weight. Other will suggest the 355 as being strong enough and lighter weight but I think the Flow feels more stable in hard corners. For tyres, I'm liking the Maxxis ADvantage UST for general stuff. However, they are really sensitive to pressure. I hated them until I realised I had to drop below 30psi for both and I weight over 200 lbs fully kitted up.

    br
    Free Member

    Many varients, but the safe and simple approach – XM819 rims and UST tyres with 50ml of Stans latex in each.

    Scienceofficer
    Free Member

    I don't think tubeless is over-hyped.

    There are alot of different ways to do it, and its something that many people don't seem to understand terribly well, since many of the issues – side wall robustness, bead lock, air burping, carcass flexibility, etc… are totally new concepts and don't really get a look in when using tubes.

    All of this results in alot of discussion, which could be interpreted as hype, but isn't really.

    It also results in just about every possible positive and negative experience going, since its likely that only a few of us are doing it in the same way, with the same kit, same techniques and same riding styles.

    I've had three punctures in 7 years – all which would have been no better had I been running a tube. I'm sold on tubeless and don't even carry inner tubes any more – my repair kit is entirely focussed on fixing tubeless tyres.

    I have rolled a couple of tyres off the rim, but I'm trying non-tubeless tyres on stans rims without any rims strips, so I'm really pushing the limits of what's safely doable really. There are so many tyres on the market, its nearly a constant rolling programme of R&D!

    Why would you change? If you're happy with tubes, I can't see you would. Tubeless is either for those that must have the latest thing, those that are convinced it does have benefits over tubes and those that are curious to see if it does have those benefits.

    Bagstard
    Free Member

    I'm running ghetto tubeless on my hardtail and very pleased with the results. One puncture in eight months, repaired without even taking the wheel off.

    Perhaps on full suss it isn't noticable, but with large volume tyres I can definitely feel the extra cushioning from my tubless rear tyre. I'm running 719 rims with Bonty big earl wets. Rider weight 15 stone with kit, camelbak.

    Waderider
    Free Member

    Just last week I was in Torridon when a tubeless UST tyre decided not to seal a puncture. A bit crap when it was such a struggle to get the tyre off to fit a tube, while the rest of the party hung about bored.

    I've been keeping an eye on tubeless on pals bikes for a while, and I've seen enough to know that it's not for me. An extra minute fixing a failed tubeless on a Scottish hill track in bad weather is unpleasant.

    MS
    Free Member

    Tubeless is the way forward.

    Had a couple of punctures mid race, runnign tubeless results in the boy behind gettind sprayed with latex for a bit before the hole seals, lose a small amoubt of pressure but nothing major. If was running tubes that would have been a stop to put in a tube.

    Less hassle, all you need to do is top up the fluid periodically. Run them on all my bikes now. Expensive – try ghetto tubless, works exactly the same

    devs
    Free Member

    Just last week I was in Torridon when a tubeless UST tyre decided not to seal a puncture. A bit crap when it was such a struggle to get the tyre off to fit a tube, while the rest of the party hung about bored.

    Putting a tube in a UST tyre is exactly the same as a normal tyre. Sounds like you need to brush up on your skills. UST system is a piece of cake. Ghetto is a faff initially but easy once you are used to it. Both are worth it IMNSHO!

    missingfrontallobe
    Free Member

    No justifiable reason IMHO. I tried a Joes tubless kit last year, front worked well, but on the first ride out the rear tyre blew off the rim twice. Sorted it once with a CO2, but second time I put a tube in, and it has been there ever since.

    Now get worried riding off road that the front will just blow off randomly and cause me to face plant/die.

    If I had the money (I don't currently) then I'd get a proper tubless UST set up ahead of a ghetto/tubless kit a la Joes or Stans.

    Scienceofficer
    Free Member

    See, missing frontal lobe is a classic example of what I'm talking about. – Tubeless is rubbish because my tyre blew off the rim.

    He doesn't (at least here) consider that the tyre bead may have been too slack, or he may have run it under inflated, or the bead interlock between his rim and tyre may not have been good enough.

    In order for him to put any of those issues to bed he would have had to, potentially, tried different tyres or rims and repeated the faff everytime he changed something – costly and a pain in the arse, especially if undertaken with little critical thought on what the difficulties are.

    Its easy to see why people are put off.

    IMO he's drawn the right conclusion though – A decent bead interlock is key and this is best achieved through a UST/LUST/2bliss/TLR bead, and a rim thats designed to grip the bead – again, UST or Stans (there must be others now too).

    ac282
    Full Member

    If you don't get punctures and have no trouble keeping up with your mates why would you bother to change anything?

    Tubless is great when riding but it is a faff to get set up to begin with. If you don't use UST tyres it's also a bit of a lottery as to what will seal and what won't. I've had tyres blow off the rim while others from the same manufacturer have been trouble free.

    imp999
    Free Member

    I am quite a fan of tubeless and have tried the ghetto method which worked but was a faff but have now settled for the Bontrager rim strips/valves. These have worked really well on Bonti wheels(obviously) and on WTB laserthings (both 19mm width – My 17mm wheels would not take the strip others might)
    They give your rim the UST profile that makes inflation V easy and sopports the bead against the rim – even when fully deflated.
    Bonti and Conti tyres were used.

    missingfrontallobe
    Free Member

    In order for him to put any of those issues to bed he would have had to, potentially, tried different tyres or rims and repeated the faff everytime he changed something – costly and a pain in the arse, especially if undertaken with little critical thought on what the difficulties are

    Science officer (is there a Spock missing from that?) is quite right, IMHO for tubeless to work it has to be done in either a ££££'s not a problem rim/tyre/rebuild every few weeks way, or a £££££'s not a problem UST rim/wheel/tyre combo.

    Might still try a different tyre on the rear and see if I can get the faffing set up to work, but not that arsed really. Bike rides fine with a tube in, so it'll take some time before I move on. Rims are even disc specific rims so won't even have the excuse of a worn out braking surface to change rims in the near future.

    Scienceofficer
    Free Member

    Named for my slightly scientific education and outlook compared to some of my more 'artistic' riding buddies.

    Nothing to do with Star trek, sadly. That would be much cooler.

    Waderider
    Free Member

    Devs, it wasn't me with the puncture, and UST tyres are tighter on rims.

    njee20
    Free Member

    If you don't get punctures and have no trouble keeping up with your mates why would you bother to change anything?

    +1

    If you don't see the point, and have no problems with your current set up, why change?

    I'm a definite convert, I have about 5 sets of tyres that I know will all inflate and seal with a track pump first time, I can run them all very low if I want and get tonnes of grip, I've had hardly any punctures, think it's about 3 in 8 years of tubeless (first UST, then Stan's), of which at least 2 just required the tyre to be re-inflated.

    elliptic
    Free Member

    UST or Stans (there must be others now too)

    Bonty wheels (Rhythm Elites) with Maxxis tyres are working well for me (finally went for it!)

    Only minor irritation is the valves which don't seat very securely so tend to leak air as you pump them (hard not to jiggle them about). Not helped by the asymmetrical rims (the locknuts don't lock properly).

    They've stayed up the rest of the time though.

    anotherdeadhero
    Free Member

    I did it to get rid of irritating pinch flats, and for me it honestly was like night and day grip-wise, you can run sensible pressures, yet the bike seems to almost pedal itself on the flat, and pinches are impossible, you may get a burp, in which case you just top it up with more air. If you rip the tyre in half on a stone, bang a sweet wrapper in the carcass, bung a tube in and the gunk will seal everything up to get you home.

    Ghetto is a complete ball-ache to set up though. It is just about worth it, but it is a complete faff. When I went to re-ghetto the wheels on my race bike, I could not get them to re-inflate, and my CO2 jobbie had broken, so i had to run tubes for the bristol bikefest …

    I could not believe just how much more skittish, skippy and hard to handle my bike was running tubes. It wasn't entirely down to the forks, the back end was all over the shop, I seemingly couldn't keep it on the deck. thats all down to the fact I had to run 40psi in the front and 50psi in the back. I was the only rider out of 4 teams not to pinch flat, but it was only due to running stupidly high pressures. Last year on ghetto it was 100% better and still no pinches.

    So yeah, go tubeless properly.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 78 total)

The topic ‘Tubeless?? Why would I change?? Other guys in the club have done’ is closed to new replies.