Atherton’s have been testing a 29″ session since last season end. Averaging 2.5-3 seconds faster over the same track compared to a 27.5″ wheel bike.
There is 2 other American brands with 29″ wheel dh bikes.
There is a direct to market German bike brand with a 29″ dh bike
Social media has lost its shit over this today! You’d think for the most part, they’d all been told that Mountain Biking was about to be banned and they’d all have to take up tiddlywinks in the future!
Only thing that surprises me is how the actual expletive deleted, has it taken this long?!?! I mean I know Intense and a couple of others made a prototype a few years ago, when 67deg HA was slack, rims were max of 23mm wide internal and the most extreme tyre available for a 29er was a WTB Stout, but those days are long gone… The pros have long known what Joe Public feared to be true about slack bikes with long wheelbases and bigger wheels meaning bikes don’t go round corners, to be utter crap. So why has it taken the designers this long to cotton on?
In a sport where fractions of a second over a 5 minute run can make or break you, and the industry made a wholesale switch from 26″ wheels to 650b as a “standard” overnight cos a small handful of pro Enduro racers reckoned they were as much as a second per minute quicker over a race run, I’m gobsmacked it’s taken this long to properly explore the benefits of big wheeled DH Bikes!
Hasn’t this been a prototype for a fair few years now? Above photo from a thread on here 3 years old. I reckon it looks good but will it ever make production?
The pros have long known what Joe Public feared to be true about slack bikes with long wheelbases and bigger wheels meaning bikes don’t go round corners, to be utter crap. So why has it taken the designers this long to cotton on?
To a point, when you get up into the XXL frames 29r just gets too long for some tracks and places. Was very interesting reading a review years ago about 2 DH bikes one was long stable and worked really well on those big fast tracks, the other was much better in the tight techy tree sections UK courses have had.
There comes a point when you have all the frame in there and then the bigger wheels it gets too big.
Only thing that surprises me is how the actual expletive deleted, has it taken this long?!?!
Meh, we have this discussion at the start of every season for the past few years
Teams have been testing them for a while, it’s only been recently mfrs got together decent aggressive 29 trail bikes
Anyone who doesn’t ride MTBs can’t even tell the difference between 26, 27.5 and 29 wheels when looking at them – they just look like bikes. And going fast looks cool.
There are issues with chainstay length when combining big wheels and long travel but as reach has got longer and head angles a bit slacker that longer back end can remain balanced. There’s also the issue of bar height but considering 160mm forked 29 enduro bikes work I can’t see 40mm more height being an issue for many riders on steep tracks.
There were issues with wheels but that should be ok now. The biggest problem holding them back has been the lack of 29 DH tyres – thank the rise of the big enduro bikes for their recent proliferation.
Lew Buchanan and Katy Winton just won round 2 of the SDA on Slash 29s, (Christo Gallagher won the seniors on his, too). Maybe Trek think it’s OK for their enduro pros to win downhill races on 29er enduro bikes? 😆
Big brands want people to buy the 27.5″ downhill bikes now and then have another latest big thing up their sleeves for next year or the year after to keep sales up. They’ve always known that 29″ would be faster, and can’t believe their luck that MTBers are stupid enough to buy the 27.5%” is far better for hills bit 29″ is best for XC. Then they change it to 29″ is better for everything.
And all the sheep go back to the shop and buy the next big thing.
It’s interesting isn’t it… I mean, if the issue is that they’re worried the 29er won’t impress with results, then yeah, in the mens’. But in the womens’ they can pretty much assume that if Rachel likes it, and it’s reasonably good, it’ll win world cups. Specialized were happy to have Mitch Gruffalo mess about on an Enduro in world cups because nobody expected him to do all that well regardless of bike but Gee’s an awkward middle ground where he could have exactly as good a season this year and people will still say “because his bike sucks”
But the whole thing just doesn’t sound very likely. Why send your pros out testing the bike then say nah don’t ride that?
Its taken a few years to get 29 wheels to fit into a long travel frame and work out what geo and suspension make them work best
now maybe the impetus hasnt been there because companies are worried 29 wont sell as well, but the fact that there have been (expensive) 29er dh protos floating around for 5 odd years shows they are trying
Because thats the point in testing, to see whether or not there is an advantage to be had
If there was no advantage in the testing, nobody’d have to tell their pros not to ride it. (I’m dubious as to whether it’s happened at all, but the only time it would happen is if the pro wants to ride the bike)
legend – Member
From an overall brand view, then yes I also enjoy looking at photos of Katy rather than ones of Gee
Trek have been very smart with their support of elite females I think. I don’t think it’s often as crude as “I will buy that bike because X rider rides it”- but perception of success is valuable and they’ve had a huge return on that with the women- and probably with a greater chance of success (if you’re going to pick one name most likely to win dh races, it won’t be a guy, it’ll be Rachel Atherton, and while Tracy was still racing it was the same for the EWS) And Katy’s a PR/social media dynamo and way more relatable than most pros, that’s a big deal.
Seriously though, I was 100% heterosexual til this happened.