It seems that UK people are being diagnosed via an (expensive) American test.
She’s actually Irish, so it’s complicated by the lack of national health system. She has spent a lot of money chasing both diagnosis and treatment. The (German) mother of another friend went through a couple of years of treatment and therapy for arthritis in her hands, wrists and elbows, all to absolutely no avail, before she came across similar stories in her own research on the web, where people were recovering from ‘arthritis’ after antibiotic treatment for Lyme. She asked he doctor for the test, it came back positive and she had was put on strong antibiotics for a few months. Athough she suffered for a while from bacterial imbalance, her arthritic symptoms have gone and she gradually regained her health.
It really makes me wonder about how many people are not diagnosed, and indeed who are misdiagnosed and treated for other ailments, or who just spend years ‘living with’ unknown problems. The list of known Lyme symptoms is staggering (here) and of course many can occur from a whole host of other not-so-serious causes. It’s really no surprise, especially given the expensive testing you mentioned, that it stays under the radar.
EDIT I was writing that while you posted Malvern RIder, it’s sheer coincidence that I mentioned the person with the arthritic symptoms.
Is there anyway to find if a particular area has Lymes or is it safer to assume any tick can carry it?
Not all tics carry the bacteria that cause Lyme, and some areas will undoubtedly have more hosts than others. The general rule is to keep the tic that bites you and take it for testing through your GP if you develop a rash.