There will always be exception to any rule as such but i’m not convinced the concept of killing or the mechanics of it will ever be in the head of a ten year old. I’m sure there was intent to hurt or scare (i don’t know every detail of it) but not much more. Maybe its how he/they were treated. The two lads needed to be punished that goes without saying but they also needed more help than i’m aware/think they got. I think its very sad all round. The criminal responsibility should depend on the age of the child committing it and amount of understanding expected for that age.
Haven’t read the whole thread so I dunno if it’s been mentioned, but in Sweden they have a different (more civilised) approach to children who kill.
A boy aged 10 has confessed to strangling a four-year-old boy with a skipping rope in a case that has shocked a rural town…………..
……………
Ing-Marie Bystrom, the head of social welfare in Ljungby, who now has care of the boy, said he would not be punished.
“The role of social services is not to punish. It is to provide care and treatment and we will now make use of child psychiatry,” she told a Swedish newspaper.
“We have already started working around the clock on care and treatment,” she added. “This is an extremely tragic and fortunately rare event.”
“Children can be cruel to each other, but not evil,” Margit Ekenberg, a child psychologist, said.
Officials said the boy had been taken into custody with his family. “The whole family has been moved, along with the boy, to a secret location,” said Carina Karlund, spokesman for the social services department in Ljungby municipality. “They are getting 24-hourtreatment to help them deal with the things that have happened. It’s important that the parents cooperate in these kind of cases.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/sweden/8957837/Sweden-strangling-10-year-old-boy-confesses-to-killing-four-year-old.html