Do you care? The media have been banging on about it for ages but it seems like one of those stories that nobody cares about.
Chat Forum
This Mark Kennedy story about undercover policemen
-
Posted 3 months ago #
-
I do, and it is starting to look like history is being rewritten, portraying him as a loose cannon, when there are big questions about the polices role in inciting criminal behaviour.
Posted 3 months ago # -
It's just another one of those stories that can easily be summed by most people with "so what"
It'll keep a few hand-wringers um-ing and ar-ing mind
Posted 3 months ago # -
definately trying to make him out as a fall guy here
people get all worked up about a police state and focus their rage on cctv cameras for some reason, while things like this people ignore
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jan/20/undercover-police-children-activists
Posted 3 months ago # -
There was a bloke on the radio this morning who made the point that to listen to someones phone needs the prime ministers signature, but to set up an undercover cop to pretend to live with someone needs just a policemans signature!!
Posted 3 months ago # -
jota180 - Member
It's just another one of those stories that can easily be summed by most people with "so what"It'll keep a few hand-wringers um-ing and ar-ing mind
Yeah, wgaf what the police get do or how they treat their officers. Hey, look, a squirrel.
Posted 3 months ago # -
I enjoyed the documentary and thought he came across well. I also feel sorry for him a bit. He's utterly lost having been shunned by both his colleagues and the protesters he thought were his "friends".
The story is pretty fascinating; betrayal, love, confession, violence.Posted 3 months ago # -
that to listen to someones phone needs the prime ministers signature
He'd be a busy man, there was something like 900 application per day a couple of years ago - not seen any recent figures
Posted 3 months ago # -
There was a bloke on the radio this morning who made the point that to listen to someones phone needs the prime ministers signature
Well he got that bit wrong then.
The brief read I've had of the HMIC report in the Guardian criticises both him and his handlers for failing to exercise proper control and managment.
Reminds me of quotes of an old MPS operation (think it was against a Fraser kid) where a source said " We wanted Donnie Brasco and got Donnie Fiasco, we wanted infiltration and all we got was penetration"
Posted 3 months ago # -
It's not high on my give a give-a-shit ometer right now. It's quite funny that a bloke can penetrate to the heart of the green movement by virtue of owning a van with a valid MOT certificate, but that's about it.
Thinking seriously about it, though, a lot would depend on how isolated a case it was. No one gave a shite about phone-hacking outside of the guardian for two years, until the full story came out and rocked the entire media apparatus of the UK.
If it turns out that there is large scale infiltration of lawful organisations (ie not the al qaeda numpties, things like unions, pressure groups, political parties etc), all done in a completely opaque and unaccountable way, then that would be potentially a big story. Even then it might not interest people as there's a long history of UK governments spying on organisations like the NUM in the 80s, so it's hardly unheard of. It hinges on the agent provocateur role played by the government I suppose.Posted 3 months ago # -
+1 kimbers
Two undercover police officers secretly fathered children with political campaigners they had been sent to spy on and later disappeared completely from the lives of their offspring, the Guardian can reveal.
In both cases, the children have grown up not knowing that their biological fathers – whom they have not seen in decades – were police officers who had adopted fake identities to infiltrate activist groups. Both men have concealed their true identities from the children's mothers for many years.
If finding all that disgusting makes me a 'hand-wringer' (almost as lame as the PC brigade 'insult') then so be it.
Posted 3 months ago # -
It's the Home Secretary's permission for a phone tap BTW (at least that was what the chap said on R4 this mornig, misquoted above).
A point made was that some of thse operations are against organisations that basically cause a nuisance, rather than ones that commit, or are planning to commit, serious crimes.
Posted 3 months ago # -
It's the Home Secretary's permission for a phone tap BTW
piece is from a couple of year back but I can't imagine massive changes
A total of 653 state bodies — including 474 councils — have the power to intercept private communications.
Bugging is usually carried out by MI5, MI6, GCHQ and the police and most people are targeted on suspicion of terrorism or serious crime.
But under laws that came into force eight years ago hundreds of public bodies can carry out surveillance.
These include the Financial Services Authority, the Ambulance Service and local fire authorities and prison governors.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1576937/Phones-tapped-at-the-rate-of-1000-a-day.html
Posted 3 months ago # -
I don't pretend to be well enough informed to judge who merits being spied on but fathering children whist doing so is just not cricket.
The mothers should be entitled to significant compensation IMHO.Posted 3 months ago # -
Sorry, it was early, and I wasn't concentrating that hard!!
Posted 3 months ago # -
Channel Four did a recent documentary on this. Mark Kennedy was stitched up like a kipper. He was interviewed and he was a mess! You couldn't help but feel sorry for him
If any other employer treated one of its staff with such incompetence and disinterest while putting them in such potentially life-threatening situations, they'd be paying out some serious dosh at employment tribunals
Whats equally as worrying are the millions upon millions of pounds of taxpayers money poured into this 'investigation' for not far short of ten years! All without securing a single conviction. Not even so much as a caution for a public order offense!
Posted 3 months ago # -
A total of 653 state bodies — including 474 councils — have the power to intercept private communications.
Bugging is usually carried out by MI5, MI6, GCHQ and the police and most people are targeted on suspicion of terrorism or serious crime.
But under laws that came into force eight years ago hundreds of public bodies can carry out surveillance.
These include the Financial Services Authority, the Ambulance Service and local fire authorities and prison governors.Sounds like sloppy journalism, 653 seems a little high to interecpt comms (more so if you read s6 of RIPA part I) - is this not the number of bodies who can lawfully acquire communications data which is something different. A council will not meet the required criteria for a warrant;
The Secretary of State shall not issue an interception warrant unless he believes— .
(3)Subject to the following provisions of this section, a warrant is necessary on grounds falling within this subsection if it is necessary— .
(a)in the interests of national security; .
(b)for the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime; .
(c)for the purpose of safeguarding the economic well-being of the United Kingdom; or .
(d)for the purpose, in circumstances appearing to the Secretary of State to be equivalent to those in which he would issue a warrant by virtue of paragraph (b), of giving effect to the provisions of any international mutual assistance agreement.RIPA and increased surveillance is a bit of a red herring; hundreds of public bodies carry out surveillance due to the wide definition of surveillance in RIPA (activity that is likely to result in the obtaining of private information about a person (whether or not one specifically identified for the purposes of the investigation or operation))and, prior to RIPA all these bodies were probably still carrying out surveillance it's just that it wasn't regulated by law as there was no legislation in place, RIPA was brought in to regulate this activity and does
Posted 3 months ago # -
I also feel sorry for him a bit. He's utterly lost having been shunned by both his colleagues and the protesters he thought were his "friends".
That's shocking - you mean the people he befriended so he could spy on to get evidence to have them sent to jail have shunned him. And he can't think of a single reason why?Posted 3 months ago # -
That's shocking - you mean the people he befriended so he could spy on to get evidence to have them sent to jail have shunned him. And he can't think of a single reason why?
Oddly, he is more concerned about being shunned by them than he is the police. He came across as regretful, heartbroken and lonely. In doing what was asked of him (his job) he was left him with nothing. No job, no family, no friends. Nothing
I feel sympathy for him. Pretty heartless not to really.Posted 3 months ago # -
Pretty heartless not to really.
yeah, almost as heartless as having a serous and committed relationship for no other reason than to establish a cover from which to spy on your new-found best mates.
No job, no family, no friends. Nothing
"karma"Posted 3 months ago # -
Also on R4 this morning.
This is the sort of dangerous extremist organisation that the police are sending undercover cops to monitor. Apparently EDL aren't extreme enough to warrant it though.
Posted 3 months ago # -
"karma"
No empathy with your fellow man then?
Posted 3 months ago # -
He was a pig!! Deserves everything he gets!
Posted 3 months ago # -
He was quite happy to play secret squirrel and screw and lie himself into a group of activists who posed no threat to society when he had the support of fellow and senior officers, now he's been screwed himself he's crying, boohoo..
No sympathy here I'm afraid,..he's just a two faced **** who came unstuck IMOPosted 3 months ago # -
What's with all this spying things?
If it means having nookie with some nice looking babes in the protest group ... I'm in.
Posted 3 months ago # -
Throughout all this I firmly think the senior Police Officers in charge really are abit Walter Mitty-wannabe MI5. Stepping badly into an area that they should not have ventured.
Clown Army. Which one do you mean, the Police in this instance or the Protesters?
Why haven't the people who dreamed up this been sacked?
Stick to Policing. Not encroaching onto others territory IMO.
Posted 3 months ago # -
He was quite happy to play secret squirrel and screw and lie himself into a group of activists who posed no threat to society when he had the support of fellow and senior officers, now he's been screwed himself he's crying, boohoo
That's a pretty fair assessment I'm afraid.
Dirty tricks eh? Next you'll be telling me the police were in bed with the tabloids too...
Its the price we pay for being able to watch the x-factor in peace.
Posted 3 months ago # -
Pisses me right off!! The police should be catching criminals not trying to incriminate bloody wooly hat protesters, we've got mi5-6 for secret squirrel bollocks,....
Posted 3 months ago # -
The problem isn't necessarily with the infiltration in itself, I can understand the need for such actions with proper oversight when the objective is to prevent serious crime.
But in this case there seems to have been little evidence of the likelihood of serious crime being committed and the police actions appear to have been political. After finding no worthwhile evidence at all, the operation tried to entice criminality.
When you also see the police actions at the student protests (undercover officers enticing violence) and the use of kettling to raise tensions at many protests.
It is extremely worrying that the underhand way the police are being used as a political tool, and that a supposedly independent police force is accepting this role.Posted 3 months ago # -
It is extremely worrying that the underhand way the police are being used as a political tool, and that a supposedly independent police force is accepting this role.
The police have been taking orders directly from Whitehall for a couple of decades now, it's just become more obvious with the advent of modern technology.
The police are not independent any more and it's a sad reflection on us, the citizens, that most people don't give a shit.
Posted 3 months ago # -
What Lifer said.
Two undercover police officers secretly fathered children with political campaigners they had been sent to spy on and later disappeared completely from the lives of their offspring, the Guardian can reveal.
This is horrible behaviour by anyone let alone public servants being paid by the taxpayer to do so.
Posted 3 months ago # -
Is that Clown Army video for real or a spoof? Made me laugh. Don't think I could have kept a straight face if I was "policing them"
Posted 3 months ago # -
How does one "secretly father a child" - you would think somebody would notice, not least when they have to step over in when it falls out of the mother in the queue at Tesco.
And, accepting that such a thing might happen - is one then obliged to name it "Jesus" ? What if it's a girl ? Jesusetta ??
Posted 3 months ago # -
Everything explained here Hels...
Posted 3 months ago # -
Actually it's not about the action of spying but really it's down to waste of money ...
I mean to be spending time with environment protest groups dossing about and enjoying life without having to write bureaucratic report or meeting sales target, joining the rat race etc and still receive salary ... you're are having a laugh.
Tell him to get a real job by doing some paper works like a good pen pusher.
Posted 3 months ago #
Reply »
You must log in to post.
