Well took the plunge, once I found out the new one had 31.6 dropper post compatible seat tubes and the other small changes Cy has made , I just had to have one .
Finished building it Friday night, Took it for a blast last night, rides as well as my other 2 I have had, but seems a little stiffer. Not sure if this is due to the addition of a dropper post (which is very long for this frame 420mm in a 16” frame) or if the new bigger seattube is actually stiffer. I’ll know better after I try it with an I beam post/saddle combo.
Looks far chunkier than the Mk2 as well, gone is the svelte skinny tube look of the MK1 and 2 Souls. That is probably amplified by the fact that it’s a small frame.
Treated myself to a new set of cranks (Next XC Carbon 28/40), Seat post, and saddle, the rest is from the Black MK2 I had, except the Arch EX wheels which are also a recent addition.
Here are the piccies, all up weight as in the photos is 25.2lbs.
For Mayhem etc with some 355’2 and Racing Ralph/Rocket Rons, plus an I beam seat/post combo it should be at just over 23lbs.
I love it. I just had mine delivered, in orange of course. Just waiting for my forks to arrive then the build can begin.
I know some people aren’t sure about the new changes but for me they make the frame quite future proof which is great, because i’m keeping this a long time.
Vortexracing: When you say it’s stiffer than your last soul, do you mean rigidly stiffer or harsher stiffer?
looks good but the chunkier seattube just doesn’t suit the soul, I think. It’s lost it’s low profile tubing and gone a bit BFe as earlier mentioned. Not a problem if that’s what people want, but personally I prefer the earlier frame.
Vortexracing: When you say it’s stiffer than your last soul, do you mean rigidly stiffer or harsher stiffer?
It felt stiffer through the seatpost whilst sat down. I think it’s a combination of the seatpost and dia of seattube. The fact that I changed the saddle and post, may have a bearing on it.
Like I said, I think i need to run it with the I beam and SDG Bel Air I had on my Mk2 to make a more accurate comparison.
Do you really need that much patio furniture though? (bottom pic)
Sure do, I’m thinking of opening up as abeer garden and selling ale to pay for the bike 😉
Here are the piccies, all up weight as in the photos is 25.2lbs.
For Mayhem etc with some 355’2 and Racing Ralph/Rocket Rons, plus an I beam seat/post combo it should be at just over 23lbs.
Your bike looks very nice, but 2 things strike me about this statement…
Firstly, good luck with the Racing Ralph and Rocket Ron’s next weekend… I live not too far from Eastnor, and will be running the thinnest tyres I can lay my hands on (probably 1.8 or 1.9″) to cut through the horrible mud. It’s gonna be wet here most of the week, including Thursday now the forecast goes that far.
Secondly, your scales need recalibrating!!!
Your frame, wheels, tyres, and just about EVERYTHING on your bike weighs more than mine… And my bike comes in at over 25lb. Your frame is 1lb heavier, seatpost 300g, your wheels about 100g, tyres about 150g roughly, pedals 50g… I could go on! What does it weigh in the real world?
Your frame, wheels, tyres, and just about EVERYTHING on your bike weighs more than mine… And my bike comes in at over 25lb. Your frame is 1lb heavier, seatpost 300g, your wheels about 100g, tyres about 150g roughly, pedals 50g… I could go on! What does it weigh in the real world?
The scales are spot on, sadly I calibrated them against some Park scales 3 weeks ago
I know I should get a life !!! 🙄
Firstly, good luck with the Racing Ralph and Rocket Ron’s next weekend… I live not too far from Eastnor, and will be running the thinnest tyres I can lay my hands on (probably 1.8 or 1.9″) to cut through the horrible mud. It’s gonna be wet here most of the week, including Thursday now the forecast goes that far.
and I have some Mud X’s for that very scenario, problem is they are the 2.0″ ones
The scales are spot on, sadly I calibrated them against some Park scales 3 weeks ago
Well in that case, PLEASE bring your scales to Mayhem with you! I wanna weigh my bike according to them… 😉
and I have some Mud X’s for that very scenario, problem is they are the 2.0″ ones
They’ll be spot on. They’re not big for 2″ tyres, they’re what I will probably run if the weather continues to be like it is. The super skinny 1.5’s some people run are really for bikes with little mud clearance (your Cotic isn’t one) IMO. A 1.8 on the back might find slightly more bite in the mud, but it will probably slow you down more on the harder terrain.
@ vortex – that is lovely looking! a few q’s if i may?!?!
im thinking of ditching me 5 f/s for a cotic soul h/t, are they good as all day bikes built on 140mm forks? i ride the peak and the rockiest bits around there, how does the soul fair on this type of terrain? obviously less comfy than a f/s but ive been thinking of it for a while (amongst other frames) and quite like the thought of going back to a h/t….current build is around 31lbs i would imagine on my f/s, so would ultimately save a about 5lbs as would be similr to your build but in 1×10 format…
i also like the fact its got a bigger seat tube, as my frame at the mo is 27.2mm so going to a size that now every decent brand does a dropper post for is pretty important! so thats a bit selling point to me too….
at 6ft and 33″ inside leg what size would be recommended? i always wanted a five in orange colour so that also appears to me too!
it will be my only bike so as i say it really does need to do everything and everything well like a five does…it looks pretty stunning though i must say in your pics!
I ride mine in the lakes, which has the same rocky stuff as the peaks. I think they ride well at about 130mm TBH. That is what I have my Revs set at. I have used them at 140mm and I think they are great DH, just a little light on the front when steep climbs are called for. Adjustable fork would be ideal, 140mm for the down and 120mm for the up
I have used it on Rocky stuff and it copes very well.
Speak to paul or Cy at Cotic about sizing and se if you can get a demo in the peaks, I think they have some demo days planned.
cool – cheers vortex – do you run it as your only bike? or do you have something f/s for bigger days out? guessing if you ride it in the lakes then its more than capable of any of the peak stuff…
ill have a think a little more about it, not going to rush into it, as if i do sell the f/s i doubt ill be able to afford to buy another f/s frame again so not to be taken lightly this decision
looks great though and its already inspired me to getting one!
Vortex, from my other thread, just bought some 140mm revs with the 20 maxle to replace my 120 Reba’s. May space them down to 130mm after playing with them.
@Oscillate if you need to run it at 140mm perhaps what you really need is a FS. Optimise for what you do most. Soul can run 140mm but is more at home on 100-120 I think.
My Soul is built light and fast for my local Southern forest XC and ST. I have a FS I use for steep rocky places, trail centres etc.
Never used a fork less than 120mm on any of my Souls, but I think anything around that fork length is great, so many other factors, such as size of bike, rider style etc make a big difference. Just try it a bit and see what you think, you may be happy at 140mm, alot of people are.