now i've been mulling this over and was talking to the GF about it but she's not much help.
i've been riding 'proper' steel bikes for 4 years. prior to that i had alu frames. i then had a 'proper' alu frame fold on me. it was then i turned to steel and appreciated the benefits of its molecular structure.
steel is more 'compliant' (bendy) than alu and this shows on XC orientated frames such as my Sanderson when compared to othe 100mm XC alu frames. it is here on all day rides that i think steel has a very good reason for being used. not so bum punchy.
i've also got an Alpine (not knocking it!). it too is steel but doesn't feel as compliant as it's been beefed-up to cope with the bigger hits its geometry allows. it is also heavy (and i'm a relative light weight). i don't ride XC uppy-downy stuff. more a slog to the top of a hill and then rag it back down.
is a beefy alu frame really less compliant than a beefy steel frame (mmmbop / pig would be a good example – any reviews?). if you're not sitting down to ride long distances, rather slog it up (here the weight of the alu would help) and ragging it back down is there still a big call to have a heavy steel frame?
so what i'm wondering is…..
…..should i stomach the weight of another steel long travel HT or look at an alu frame?
was also interested by Brant's comment in his blue pig video re. the seat stays: "good spring, not a great deal going on there. less spring than most people think"
but then i think i should just MTFU and swallow the weight thing. steel just looks better. nice and clean lines, no oversized tubes.
so, tell me about your long travel HT, steel and alu. pics would be nice, too…..
whatdyafink?