Fred has sad to me that he has tried to contact the mods several times to find our why he was banned this time and non of them will answer him. He finds it strange that Ton can apologise for being racist but Fred can't even get an explanation from the Mods.
It certainly looks like double standards and hypocrisy to me. I guess I am getting rather close to the line myself now.
Maybe they're just bored of him now TJ, how many chances are you supposed to give someone?
That and they may well just be too busy to bother to try and get some rational from him. He could be a really nice guy I have no idea but he comes on here and acts like a complete nob most of the time.
I guess I am getting rather close to the line myself now.
My theory is that STW is actually an opinion monitoring system operated by the Civil Service, masquerading as a bike forum.
That would certainly explain the generally leftist attitude on here in the past, and if your ban co-incided with a change in government – the PM gets the statistics he wants to get, and nobody stands in his way!
Edit – 😆 just in case anyone thinks I'm actually serious.
The staff don't necessarily do the moding, while they may have the overall say at times a lot of the 'active' mods are volunteers who have other jobs, interests and generally may not be around. When they get an email they will filter through the important ones I guess and Fred wanting unbanned, again, is probably not a priority to them.
I have had to moderate a forum, as a part of my job. The problem with fred types is they generate too much work. If someone has been banned before I would have to watch them more closely to make sure they don't do it again. If they are on most threads all day then it can take quite a lot of time checking their chat history. Especially if they try to avoid swear filters and other "hot" words. Most people don't need to be monitored so you can get on with other work to make the site better for everyone else. If you spend half a day checking one person who can behave in an unacceptable way it would probably be in the interest of the forum/site to ban them. That way the site can be better for all the other members.
It's more entertaining when he's here. Just like it was more entertaining when glupton was here. And would be less entertaining if TJ got banned. That said I'm happy just to read the arguments, I'm too lazy to join in with them, so maybe that's why I don't find such people frustrating?
in my post as bombadillo, i asked why soft lefties were attacking a politician (mr griffin)
teej, ernie and a few others took this to be rascist.
i then proceded to wind them up for a while, until ernie verbaly attacked me saying i was a rascist.
i asked him to show me where i had been rascist ( i had not)
he failed to show me where i had been rascist.
i was banned for a week. 8)
"in my post as bombadillo, i asked why soft lefties were attacking a politician (mr griffin)" And once again ton, you're shooting yourself in the foot. Nick Griffin is not a politician, he's a nazi c**t, and by describing the people who are prepared to stand up and say so
as 'soft lefties' you come over as well, if not racist, certainly reactionary.
But your opinion of him doesn't alter the fact he IS a politician – the leader of a recognised political organisation irrespective or whether or not you agree with their views. I sometimes wonder (given how many times you have repeated yourself calling him that particular schoolyard name) how much you understand about politics and our democratic political system.
ton – we've been there before. I dont give a fiddlers **** whether he was elected, we both know that it was done dishonestly, we both know he's a lying nazi tossbag, and what I dont get is why you seem so keen to defend him.
Nick Griffin is not a politician, he's a nazi <deleted>,
You're free to hold that opinion of him, but by expressing it on here in that way you're breaking the forum rules in a way that standing up for him isn't.