Just curious really… someone commented on my calves today (I wear shorts a lot, even in winter!), had never thought of them as been stupidly big or anything, so took the tape measure out tonight and quantified this, they’re 43cm/17″ in circumference (at their widest point), ankles are 25cm/10″. Years of cycling have made them the only part of my body that can be said to be ‘sculpted’ I guess! 😆

Just wondering what other cyclists measurements are like really, for a laugh…

37cm…. God I’m bored at work!

Edit: 15″ for those who don’t work in IS Units.

I am guessing you mean circumference?

A puny 15″ here.

Factored against height, coogan will win though.

Ja, circumference is what I meant (have edited my OP 🙂 ). I’m 5’8″/172cm tall btw…

17″ here, don’t mess with me!

18.5″

Courtesy of years of lifting weights, cycling and also genetically big calves (inherited from my Dad)

Edit: measured by highly accurate headphone cable and ruler method 😉

Do big calves = more power (for cycling at least)?

about 24 inches

not been riding much so mine are losing some of their definition
.
.

17 inch with 32 inch waist

Do big calves = more power (for cycling at least)?

They probably contribute, but in a minor way compared to quads, glutes and hamstrings.

calves – 15 1/2 inch – but that is more then half my inside leg measurment

Stuey – hilariously, that’s exactly the same method I used. 20″ here.

Pathetic 35cm here. It’s ok though, ‘cos I’m faster than you…

18 1/2 inches, 5 foot 8, theyre a bit smaller than usual after time off the bike.

16.5″ which is the same as my collar size strangely…

Calf measurements at the worlds http://www.pinkbike.com/video/158031/

Mine are18.5in or 47cm

Mrs PPs are 14in, 36cm but she walks more than she cycles

15 1/2 inch

and
9 were it counts 😉

When I was at training college there was a guy who had had to have special fireboots made up for his unfeasibly large calves. Boots had to be cut, then triangular inserted “welded” in.

Doubt he’d have been much of a bike rider though. The Rhino rides again!

18 here.

About 18 inches, thigh is around 27 and i’m always splitting my work trousers when stretching!

18″ but then I am fat 🙂

i’m under 14″! but that’s less weight to carry 😉

13″ measured over my skinny jeans 😕 . . . what do I win?

14(& a bit)” I iz massiv!

!8″ but 18 1/2″ with hair..

14″ here at 6’1″

I’ve had gentle abuse on the road as I don’t provide much drafting potential!

15″ soft, 18.5 hard…. 😯

Don’t know, but can just about get two hands round one.

16″ – I’ve always thought they were super skinny but some seem to be skinnier than mine!

5’8″, 42″ chest, 29″ waist, 11.5 stone if that makes any difference. Oh, it doesn’t. Damn.

18 3/4″ on me. 6FT 2

See that cartoon turkey leg…

I’ll leave the rest to your imagination..

EDIT: errr.. curiosity got the better of me.. 14″

>Ja, circumference is what I meant (have edited my OP ). I’m 5’8″/172cm tall btw… <

So, you’re a wee guy with fat legs…

calf 18″
thigh 25″
waist 34″
Chest 46″

5′ 9 1/2″

Always wished for bigger calves, but never struggled for power or hill climbing ability..I am 6 foot and 13 stone but calves only 14.5″, my boys are 14.25″ and he is nearly fifteen…Wife trumps us both with 18″so better be careful she don’t kick my a$$.

I’ve never ever thought about measuring my calves till I read this thread! what a daft thing to do!
taking fat into the equation, there is a woman at work with calves the width of my head, each.

ankle 8.5″
calf 15.5″
waist 31″
bicep 15.5″
forearm 13.5″
chest 43″
height 5ft 10
weight 71kg (fatty at the moment 😥 )

and the important measurement for “little taz”
hmmmmm anyone got something that measures in microns?

Just checked, 405mm / 16″ quite happy with that, strangely also the same as my collar measurement.

32″ waist and 79kgs/12st 6lbs

16″ here. I’m only short ,so they look bigger! 😀