Martin has both now, though i’m not sure he’s on here.
Re the 29+ rear end, no it won’t, but it will take a wide rim with a 2.4 or 2.5 rear tyre with plenty of room to spare. There’s a reason behind this, and that’s short stays. I wanted the Stooge to have a light front end that can be placed anywhere at any time, 29+ doesn’t really lend itself to this due to the need for longer stays.
Also, The Knard is a brilliant front tyre for absorbing trail chatter. I don’t think this is anywhere near as important on the back and prefer a lighter, tighter tyre to aid acceleration.
I guess this is just my take on it. I designed the bike having ridden loads of rigid bikes over the years, all of which felt wrong in some way, shape or form. For me, the Stooge feels absolutely perfect. i can ride down anything i want and at any speed and it inspires nothing but confidence. I’ve not ridden a Jones so couldn’t compare, but the Stooge is longer and slacker, albeit slightly.
All i really wanted to do was bring a fast and fun rigid bike into existence at a price that isn’t prohibitive, that allows people to discover that a simple bike with great geometry is a genuine option.
Old trails become new trails, your skill levels go through the roof, and no more wasting hundreds of pounds on new Fox sliders because you forgot to service them every 30 hours 🙂