I suppose with any tyre debate it’s a lot down to personal preference but would you say the trade off of reduced grip is made up by a noticeable increase in faster rolling?
It Depends. If I’m on a “all sorts of riding” day then yes, absolutely. If I’m on a “grind up the hills, it’s all about the downhills” then not so much- it’s a compromise so it depends where you want to take the downsides.
For typical scottish enduro racing with lots of squelchy bits I don’t personally think it works out- I lose time in braking/having to control speed more carefully and some techy sections are very sketchy. I feel fast because I’m more on edge but I’m slower. The transitions are much easier but that’s not really that important. On a more mixed day that compromise changes.
For the same sort of riding but not on the clock, it’s a lot of fun and I think it works fine even though it slows me a little.
For trailcentre riding, XC on the big bike, drier conditions hard stuff, it’s very very good. Makes older fast tyres like the Ardent seem a bit rubbish imo.
Just depends where you want to make your compromise.