My point being wasn’t it interesting that our press managed to major so heavily on it in the run up and during the 2008 Olympics, dropping it straight after?
Putting aside all of the actual issues for one moment what does that sort of behaviour actually achieve? Does it sell more papers, does it make the intransigent more so, does it further the ends of the Tibetans themselves, is it governement sponsored for political ends? Whats it all about?
It just seems really weird to me, and looking back the intensity of the coverage for a month or two followed by nothing just doesn’t seem right. Surely if people were interested and bought papers because of it that interest doesn’t just wain overnight. Perhaps people never were really engaged with it and there was another motive.
It came up this am in a chat with a Chinese supplier, and got me thinking so thought I’d kick it around a bit with you lot.