Viewing 4 posts - 81 through 84 (of 84 total)
  • So thats not the slightest bit provocative then, is it?
  • Shibboleth
    Free Member

    Junkyard – Member
    Still not defending your quote as meaning ours or referring to rights then?

    I'm sorry, you've lost me completely. I've no idea what exactly you're getting at now. I've explained why MY rights are the same as YOUR or OUR rights in the most idiot proof way I can think of.

    If you can't get your head round that, it tells me one thing: that you don't even reach 'idiot' on my intellect scale.

    konabunny
    Free Member

    Shibboleth – Member
    That sentence makes so little sense on so many levels. Ask your tutor to run through the use of that wonderful punctuation mark, the comma, and get him or her to clarify how many Rs there are in the word "tack".

    The commas in your first sentence were completely unnecessary.

    Also, the Pedantry Police would like to bring you in for further questioning on whether something can fail to make sense on multiple levels as opposed to failing to make sense on any level.

    10
    Full Member

    Am I too late for the Hob-Nobs? Just made a tea and found out the missus finished the last of my biscuits 🙁

    konabunny
    Free Member

    "I'm not that keen on him having the oxygen of oxygen…"

    I like this joke, I will be nicking it later
    Feel free, I stole it myself!
    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Linda_Smith

Viewing 4 posts - 81 through 84 (of 84 total)

The topic ‘So thats not the slightest bit provocative then, is it?’ is closed to new replies.