Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • SCOTT Voltage YZ vs UMF HARDY 4
  • geo2013
    Free Member

    Hi all,

    Who is better SCOTT Voltage YZ or UMF HARDY 4 ?

    SCOTT Voltage YZ 20
    http://www.scott-sports.com/global/en/products/227740006/bike-voltage-yz-20-s/#.UYFMz8r4X9U

    UMF HARDY 4
    http://www.merida-bikes.com/en_int/bike/2013/84/MTB+Hardtails/Hardy+4

    I’ve had an Merida couple of years ago, and it had good strong frame. I didn’t tested a Scott ? How it is ? Is Scott better ?

    Thanks.

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    what are you planning to do with it?

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    [being cautious edit]

    geo2013
    Free Member

    I want to use for dirt/street.

    geo2013
    Free Member

    I searched Google, but I couldn’t find and reviews for comparing this 2 bikes.

    nigelb001
    Free Member

    Some better components on the Hardy, at least its got Alivio vs Acera but both got XCM forks which are frankly rubbish.

    geo2013
    Free Member

    Yes ideed, but regarding the frame geometry who is better for street ?

    ianv
    Free Member

    Probably the scott, but neither seem ideal.

    Do you have a decathlon near you or even online decathlon. The subsim is pretty cheap and looks more suited.

    http://www.decathlon.fr/subsin-triple-evo-id_8188894.html

    ianv
    Free Member
    nigelb001
    Free Member

    If it were me, I’d probably get an Octane One Zircus frame – £160 – bang on a ‘Zocchi DJ fork and build it up from there using bargain but good bits, 1×9 ditch the front mech. Cost a more but would be your own choices. But then I’m a 61 year old fat bloke so what do I know? 🙂

    geo2013
    Free Member

    That SUBSIN looks ok, but I think the frames from Scott and Hardy are more durable.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

The topic ‘SCOTT Voltage YZ vs UMF HARDY 4’ is closed to new replies.