Do you think the SB95 would stand up to it??
Yes, though you might need some sturdier wheels.
I’m finally writing a review of my Banshee Spitfire after the best part of a year with it. It really has been bloody brilliant. It’s interesting that initially it felt like quite a tank, monster trucking its way over everything with bigger wheels, 160mm Pike and the the magical back end that feels like far more than 140mm.
Now that I’ve got it tweaked to perfection it is very flickable despite the long wheelbase and slack head angle – partly from running less monstrous tyres (amazing how much grip you get from a bigger wheel and really good suspension), partly from running quite light rebound damping so it’s easy to get off the ground, partly from swapping to wider bars and shorter (effective) stem length.
The rougher the terrain, the better it performs. If you want a longer travel version then the Rune is very similar but 160mm at the back. I don’t have a problem with carbon frames but they are rather a lot of money for what I consider a fairly insignificant weight saving (might make a difference if you’re trying to podium on a race but I’m far from that quick) and although they’re probably stronger in terms of longterm fatigue failure resistance they’re more prone to crash damage. And the manufacturing process is not terribly nice for anyone. New Alpine looks great! I’d pay the extra for a CCDBA to get the most out of the single-pivot suspension.
I like the adjustable geometry on the Banshees because it changes the feel so much. I don’t change it often but it’s great to drop the Spitfire to sub 66 deg HA and ground scraping BB for downhill stability on uplift days and then bring it back up for more pedal clearance and flickability on my home trails.