Viewing 32 posts - 41 through 72 (of 72 total)
  • Santa Cruz Hightower
  • bigjim
    Full Member

    Too steep and too short

    you’re either trippin or trollin

    It’s nearly as long as my Smuggler, and that’s one of the longest non-weird bikes around. I wouldn’t want any longer, tight corners and hairpins already need a good bit of planning to get round. I wouldn’t want any slacker than 67 on a 29er either, steering would be painfully slooooooow.

    I think it looks like it should be a sweet bike, damn expensive but that’s the way top end carbon is going. SC seem to be catching up with Transition etc in terms of geometry too, previously they’ve been too short for lanky freaks like me.

    thepodge
    Free Member

    Nicolai / Mojo, Pole, Airdrop, Zumbi & Starling are all making interesting things right now.

    Interesting comment above that some one wouldn’t want anything longer than what they already have as its already difficult to get round corners… Assuming you are not riding an XL frame then how do you think tall people manage?

    I hear Minnar is running an XL V10 and Ratboy is running a medium / large V10. Both seem pretty good at getting round corners so is it really an issue with the bike or would they be faster on a smaller frame?

    singlespeedstu
    Full Member

    As a Tallboy ltc owner that’s running a longer fork, Anglest and reducer bushes this has actually got me interested in a test ride.
    Not been even slightly interested in any other full suss 29er until now.
    The fact it will also take B+ wheels is a bonus for me too. So long as it’ll take full + sized wheels on 45mm rims?
    Barney?

    singlespeedstu
    Full Member

    Double post.

    antares
    Free Member

    I hear Minnar is running an XL V10

    XXL actually

    thepodge
    Free Member

    I’m surprised he can get something that long round the curvature of the earth.

    He’s not stupid so he must be picking that size frame for a reason and that reason must cancel out this long bikes can’t turn corners theory, no?

    thepodge
    Free Member

    http://m.pinkbike.com/news/evil-bikes-the-wreckoning-first-look-core-bike-2016.html

    At a very quick glance an evil medium is very similar to a santa cruz large, so that’s another actually long frame. This post is brought to you in the middle of eating my tea so could be wrong.

    goldenwonder
    Free Member

    Looked & felt great to me yesterday.
    Large felt too big for me, which the Tallboy doesn’t. (sat on both with 650B+ & 29er wheels as did many)
    Angle set won’t be possible, as they’re now integrated headsets & not press in cups.
    & Since when is 67 degree head angle too steep on a 29er??
    Try riding one & then say the same. Stumpy Evo 29 is 68 & you don’t hear people saying how steep they are.

    chestrockwell
    Full Member

    Why would you assume he’s not on the XL podge? He is called big Jim and describes himself as a lanky freak.

    You have not told use what uber LLS gnarpoon you ride yet?

    honourablegeorge
    Full Member

    thepodge – Member

    At a very quick glance an evil medium is very similar to a santa cruz large, so that’s another actually long frame. This post is brought to you in the middle of eating my tea so could be wrong.

    The reach on the Hightower Size L is 450mm – The Evil Following is 444 in Large. Wheelbase on the Hightower is longer too. And the Hightower is slightly slacker

    The Wreckoning is a 160mm bike, and only has 2mm reach on the Hightower, and a degree or so head angle.

    SC bikes have traditionally been very short, but I don’t think the Hightower is short compared to the competition.

    bigjim
    Full Member

    I hear Minnar is running an XL V10 and Ratboy is running a medium / large V10. Both seem pretty good at getting round corners so is it really an issue with the bike or would they be faster on a smaller frame?

    Those are DH bikes, I don’t think the hightower is being pitched as a DH bike or for use in the same way on the same kind of trails. I imagine a DH bike would ride like a pig if you tried to use it as a trail bike like you would the Hightower.

    Regardless the V10 actually has shorter reach than the Hightower size for size anyway.

    Yes I am on an XL Smuggler and just under 6’5″. It’s a very long bike, using your V10 reference it is quite a bit longer reach than the XXL V10. Tip to toe it was the longest bike on the Inners uplift trailer when I took it on that, though that is partly the bigger wheels rather than wheelbase – DH bikes have slacker headset and longer travel which makes the wheelbase long.

    I’m guessing you are basing your judgement on geometry tables rather than real world experience, if so I suggest actually riding a few of these kind of bikes to get a feel before passing judgement.

    devbrix
    Free Member

    [/singlespeedstu – Member
    As a Tallboy ltc owner that’s running a longer fork, Anglest and reducer bushes this has actually got me interested in a test ride.]

    What’s the slacked out LTc ride like on the trail ? Put a 1.5 angleset in my LTc with a 150mm fork and front end was so floppy at slow speed. Never took it out in anger though. On your advice might put the angleset back in and give it a blast 😀

    singlespeedstu
    Full Member

    Got a 160 fork 1.5 Angleset and shock bushes and it rides fine both uphill and downhill. Takes a bit more weight bias towards the front on steep climbs but it’s no been a problem in the slightest.

    devbrix
    Free Member

    Looks like slack weekend for me singlespeedstu cheers

    barney
    Free Member

    Singlespeed Stu – yep, it runs 3.0 27.5+ chubby wheels with (I think) 50mm rims – tho the rims could be a bit narrower. Whatever; they fit. I loved the driftability – or at least the controlled drifting – that the chubbies lent to the bike, although I concede that might’ve been the tread pattern rather than the fatness per se.

    Devbrix – my main bike atmo is a slacked out XL Tallboy LT – HA is reduced 2 degrees and I’m running a 150mm Pike, 50mm stem and 800mm bars, and it’s brilliant. You don’t lose much on the climbs, and you gain tons on the descents. But again, I had to change how I ride it; it needs different techniques, coaxing where it used to need pushing and vice versa.

    It really works (for me) if you put a little more air in the fork and weight the front end more; pushing into corners rather than letting the fork lead, if you see what I mean. Odd to go back to it after riding the Hightower, though – my brain keeps on expecting them to ride the same and they really don’t.

    wobbliscott
    Free Member

    The Hightower doesn’t appear to be any longer than other SC bikes. Its only 5mm longer than a Bronson of equivalent size so naff all really especially considering the Bronson is 1 degree slacker so even less of a difference on wheelbase.

    EDIT: I probably mean Front Centre length rather than wheel base.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    The reach on the Hightower Size L is 450mm – The Evil Following is 444 in Large. Wheelbase on the Hightower is longer too. And the Hightower is slightly slacker

    The Wreckoning is a 160mm bike, and only has 2mm reach on the Hightower, and a degree or so head angle.

    SC bikes have traditionally been very short, but I don’t think the Hightower is short compared to the competition.
    Interesting. It seems SC are no longer “short” bikes.

    whippersnapper
    Free Member

    Barney, that sounds a grand idea and as I need some new forks I may as well give it a go. Any problems with bottom bracket height? Any headset recommendations?

    For what it is worth I think the hightower looks ace but ill stick with my lt, i think its brilliant, although I’m a weirdo who seems to quite like a short bike. The smuggler and banshee prime felt like they were running away with me.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Oh, I ran a 1.5deg slackset and 160mm forks on a LTc. It rode great! Prob still a bit tall and short by modern standards.

    thepodge
    Free Member

    OK, this is a prime example of why I shouldn’t skim read at work. A large would give me an extra 20mm reach and 11mm in ett while also giving me 7mm more seatpost adjustment over my 3 year old 29er but I’ve already got a 67 ha and would happily go slacker, I can turn better on this than my old 70 ha 26er.

    I still stand by the idea that those numbers aren’t anything special. I think I just expect too much from a new bike.

    barney
    Free Member

    Whippersnapper. I’m using the Cane Creek angleset. It’s pricey, but pretty good – although you need to run it tighter than you’d expect, and it still benefits from being stripped down and greasing every month or so to avoid creaking, which is a faff.
    BB height seems OK – after all, I’m running a (slightly) longer than recommended fork, slightly slacker, so it all evens out in the end, I guess.

    bigjim
    Full Member

    I still stand by the idea that those numbers aren’t anything special

    I’d say they’re special compared to how things were a few years ago, and good by current developing standards. I know things are way slacker now than what used to be classed as normal but i can’t see them getting much slacker on big wheels without things getting a bit ponderous and wheelbases getting a bit daft.

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    I still stand by the idea that those numbers aren’t anything special

    You want revolutionary go with the small guy making frames they don’t care if they sell.
    The Big guys are and will always be evolutionary.
    Also static ha is balls unless you can account for the way the suspension sits. 2 fs frames with identical static ha can have a completely different sagged ha.

    yorkycsl
    Free Member

    Barney,

    Had the pleasure of riding with you in Dalby last year, old bloke on a Bronson from York, now riding a rather garish 2016 version but hankering after a Hightower, I know your tall what size was the HT you rode? I’m thinking L at 6ft, feels spot on with the new Bronson being that bit longer than the one I’m selling.

    Cheers
    Mark

    barney
    Free Member

    Ha! Hello yorkycsl – a great little ride that was 🙂 The Hightower in the pics (that I rode) was an XL…

    Cheers!

    yorkycsl
    Free Member

    Yup a cheeky little ride any time your fancy the hidden gems let me know no worries, new Bronson does feel more comfortable so hoping a L HT is around the same.

    Hope your all settled over there & the floods didn’t affect you.

    PS Jammy sod the HT recky didn’t look too shabby dry dusty trails in South America huh, hard life…

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    As this has popped back up was taking a look yesterday, price wise it’s very close to the stuntjumper over here (carbon to carbon) and some nice builds on them. It’s certainly got me keen to try one.

    barney
    Free Member

    …almost *too* dusty – not a phrase I thought I’d ever say 😉

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    lol gets used all the time here Barney, in some ways dust and dry are worse than wet for riding in 😉

    gothandy
    Full Member

    Reading the reviews the general consensus is that the hightower is a “big wheeled” Bronson, I’m guessing they mean ’cause the way it rides, but it looks a lot more like a Nomad with the shock setup and re-triangle. Anyone got any ideas what they mean?

    p.s. singlespeedstu and devbrix I’m running angleset (1 deg) and 130mm forks on my tallboy 2 and it feels great.

    yorkycsl
    Free Member

    gothandy,

    If the HT rides like a new Bronson then in my limited time on my new Bronson it’ll be spot on even quicker maybe, I’m interested in any early demo days & join the queue though I’m looking at 29 set up.

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    Just seen one in the flesh… 29r flavour looks very nice colour is a good one

Viewing 32 posts - 41 through 72 (of 72 total)

The topic ‘Santa Cruz Hightower’ is closed to new replies.