INSULATION: ROOF INSULATION IN THE YELLOW HOUSE
75% of the new insulation was inside the roof. Because there was no underlay behind the existing tiles, insulating materials had to be waterproof and so only ‘Celotex’ PIR sheet insulation was appropriate. Building control required a 50mm gap behind the tiles for ventilation, so the maximum thickness possible between the 100mm rafters was 50mm of insulation (or equivalent).
This would have been sufficient to exceed current building regulations, and most conversions go no further. We wanted to double the existing standards so we decided to add further sheets of 35mm thickness laid across the rafters on the inside- a small loss of head space for a large gain in insulation. What is more, the additional sheets prevent the rafters from acting as cold bridges (above).
Another reason for laying an additional sheet across the rafters is as insurance against the loosening of the insulation. It is hard to obtain a perfect tight fit of insulation between rafters, and it is likely to be further loosened as the rafters shift with time. Once loosened, cold air may be able to force its a way around, compromising the insulation.
After fixing 50mm of PIR insulation between the rafters all obvious gaps were filled by polyurethane foam from an aerosol can (not good environmentally, but a justifiable vice). Then sheets of insulation were laid lengthwise across the rafters and similarly sealed. 9mm plasterboard sheets were then laid narrow side on across over the Celotex and nailed in place. The aim was to create a patchwork of layers without adjoining gaps. The final roof had a u-value of less than 0.2, compared with the u-value of 0.35 required by building controls.
It is important to remember that the walls in the loft adjoining the neighbouring attics are also effectively external walls as neither of the attics on either side is occupied. In this case any insulation will abut into the loft space, so it needed to be thinner than we would otherwise have wanted. We opted for a good performance thermal plaster board which projected only 4cm. With the clinker block wall, it gave a pretty miserable u-value of 0.49. Fortunately these side walls only had a quarter of the area of the rest of the roof.
The roof above the extension could not rise significantly above the level of adjoining roofs in the terrace and so, with space again at a premium, expanded PIR sheeting was the best option. The extension is on the cold north side of the house, so we specified 100mm thickness under the turf roof.
Source: http://www.theyellowhouse.org.uk