- This topic has 54 replies, 49 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by simmy.
-
Car Road tyres…worth the extra cost of going premium?
-
tpbikerFree Member
Need to new rear tyres for my boxter, and apparently the ones on the car at the moment are cheap budget rubbish with no place on a high performance car. That said I drive like a grandad and as such at no point have I ever thought I needed more grip on the rear as I slowly round a corner.
So is it worth upgrading to a premium brand, and if so whats good? Pirelli P 0s can be had for about £150 quid a corner, which seems reasonable. Are they any good?
kwackFree MemberYes in a nutshell. Its the bits that interact with the ground. Depending on tyres you probably only talking £20-£30 extra per corner for a decent brand. Better noise control, braking, grip, Why have a decent car if you only gonna stick rubbish on it. Its not a 30k per year taxi
If you are looking at Pirelli P Zero you should also look at Goodyear Eagle F1, Michelin pilot sport etc as well
jam-boFull Memberignoring the super budget ditchfinder specials, i find better tyres don’t grip much better but wear & last much better than the mid range tyres. something do do with a higher silica content I seem to recall reading somewhere.
bailsFull MemberYes.
I’ve got a sensible diesel hatchback (not even an audi, for shame) and the crap budget tyres that were on it when I bought it were terrifying, especially in the cold and/or wet.
Uniroyals and then Dunlops were/are loads better.
It’s not (just) about cornering or doddery/sporty driving. It’s about doing an emergency stop on a rainy M6 or a greasy country lane when a salesman/deer/baby robin’s face veers out in front of you.
epicsteveFree MemberMichelin Pilot Sports if you want grip, Continentals if you want good wear and wet weather grip.
craigxxlFree Memberi find better tyres don’t grip much better but wear & last much better than the mid range tyres.
My findings too. Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta is favourite mid range tyre of mine which compares in grip, noise and economy with the Michelin Pilot Sport 3 but they don’t last as long. If I can’t get the Michelin PS3 on offer, which thankfully with Costco I normally can, then I end up going for the Vredestein.
Some tyres tend to lose grip as they wear so beware of these. Premium brands tend to be better at keeping a consistent grip as they wear.You might be best going on a Porsche forum and see what they are recommending.
P20Full MemberI’ve always found the better tyres to be better all round. Grip, noise, feel all seem better in my experience and I’ve never owned anything sporty. Try Tyreleader online for prices
Rockape63Free MemberIts also how good they are in very wet weather. Sometimes you only find out the hard way.
With regard to wear, the softer the rubber the better the grip, the faster the wear. Hard rubber is fine for trundling around slowly, but you need soft rubber to maximise the cornering.
thomthumbFree Memberlook at stopping distance tests if you can find them.
difference between budget and premium is huge.
60-0; when the best tyres stopped, the worst is still doing 30 mph!
HoratioHufnagelFree MemberReplaced the budget tyres (with plenty of tread left) on my 2nd hand Focus with some branded ones and it was like I’d just bought a new car.
Huge drop in noise levels, whole thing felt smoother, no shaking of the steering wheel that couldn’t be removed even with wheel balancing, more grip. Cruises very quietly on the motorway now.
They weren’t fancy low profile ones though, so only 55 each.
tpbikerFree MemberI only do about 2000 miles a year max so wear isn’t an issue. Boxter forums seems to suggest falkon tyres are ok, but not sure which one to go for as the suggested one appears discontinued.
Can get Pilot sport 3s are 150 quid a corner, not cheap but not as crippling as i thought they might be
cr4shFree MemberYes! Driving over 1k miles a week here. Just put my second set of Michelin cross climates on the Skoda superb estate. Got just under 40k miles out of the last set could probably have gone more tbh but I wasn’t paying for the replacements. Great all year tyre plus quiet and stops well. Had pirelli,hankook and continental on my company cars over the last 5 years and these are by far the best of the ones I’ve had on and not too expensive at £108 a corner fitted locally (and £50 back in fuel vouchers from Michelin on promo ATM – more for bigger tyres)
spenceFree MemberShort answer, Yes.
In a similar position at the moment, looking for tyres. Need to replace the F1 Asymmetric 2’s on the rear of the Jag, current ones have done 15k and down to 4mm. Car had some hideous things on it when I bought it, Landsail (????), although brand new they were dangerous. Swapped them out for the Goodyears which have been great and I’am looking for some replacements, up to 3’s now, but 97Y’s seem out of stock. Also considering P Zeros.Oh, the longer answer. Always fit the best tyre you can afford. Unfortunately that does tend to be one’s from the big budget branded manufacturers. Doesn’t mean some of the “new” brands aren’t worth considering but check test results and reviews – ADAC test, evo tyre review etc.
munrobikerFree MemberIf wear isn’t an issue then I’d look at mid-range. I’d concur that more expensive tyres last longer but I’ve switch from a mix between cars of Dunlop Sport Maxx, Michelin Pilot Sport and Continental Sport Contact (of which the Dunlops have been the best for grip and feel, the Contis for wear) to Hankook Ventus Evos and the Hankooks feel as good and handle as well as the premium brands.
Their wear is unknown but Evo liked how the handled and of the mid-range tyres only the Toyo Proxes they tested was significantly worse than any of the premium stuff.
brassneckFull MemberCan get Pilot sport 3s are 150 quid a corner, not cheap but not as crippling as i thought they might be
Costs me near that for an S Max so consider yourself lucky 🙂
Used to pay less for the Elise, but did have to replace them more often!
slowblokeFree MemberOf course the plus side of budget tyres on performance cars is that they protect your drivetrain (due to less grip causing less strain) so you be sure that your gearbox etc. are all working fine as you slide through the fence and into a field 😛
NorthwindFull Memberit’s all pretty relative, there’s a massive upgrade as soon as you get out of the real crap, your autogrips and that (my car came with proper MOT-replacement ditchfinders on it and I’d honestly call them unfit for purpose, the wet weather grip was appalling). But then it’s less simple, for one thing there’s midrange products that outperform big name brands etc.
Ventus Evos were mentioned up the page, not sure they’re a good pick for a boxter mind but they come very highly recommended for stuff like my lukewarm repmobile, and they do the job very very well.
one_happy_hippyFree MemberYes on a performance car like a boxster why would you cheap out on tyres. That said they make an incredible different to handling even on cheaper cars.
I am a massive fan of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymetric 2’s (new version 3 out now).
Some people suggest they wear faster than others but if you are not being unkind to them then they are pretty good. In fact I’m 15k miles in to a set and I’m not massively careful (though AWD has helped.)
allthegearFree MemberYes – always worth spending on good tyres. I’m amazed at people that spend all their money on a fancy car and then skimp on the one thing that connects fancy car to road.
Continentals on the car and Bridgestones (Battlax t30’s I believe) on the bike.
Rachel
sobrietyFree MemberSome tyres tend to lose grip as they wear so beware of these.
Pirelli P7s defo do this, once you get near the wear limit braking on a greasy road is instant abs, which is pretty unnerving!
redmexFree MemberGoodyear Eagle F1 what a difference from the wanki sorry wanli crap that was on the car, if you like no warning unpredictable drifting buy the Chinese ones the Goodyears are made in Germany
PePPeRFull MemberYup, premium tyres and buy them from Tyre leader here to offset the costs.
mattyfezFull MemberCan’t generally go wrong with continental or Goodyear..
High end pirellis are good but the bog standard ones are junk.
porter_jamieFull MemberSecond the Goodyear eagle f1. Totally night and day better than the budget shite that was on it, in every way you can imagine. Noise, wet grip, ride comfort, steering feel, and general feeling of stability and safety.
To be honest any premium tyre will be so much better it’s not funny. I like good years. Michelin are of course excellent but were more expensive. Contis ime wear worse than michelin but that was on a van.imnFull MemberThe EU tyre ratings are worth looking at to help you pick too. I tend to look for best wet grip in favour of economy or noise, which generally means a major brand.
a11yFull MemberI’m with imn on this – wet grip above anything else. Always rated Uniroyal Rainsport 2 (think there’s a ‘3’ model now) and had them on more than one car.
Recently went with Nexen N Fera RU1’s on the wife’s Freelander 2 due to their wet weather performance supposedly being on par with the Uniroyals. Absolutely no complaints. http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/Nexen/N-Fera-RU1.htm
Edit – if the cross climates had been available in our size we’d have gone with them, hearing nothing but praise for them. Instead we’re just going to swap to winters for, arm, winter time.
timberFull MemberThe EU tyre ratings I find a bit vague and don’t take into account the characteristics of different cars.
Of various tyres I have used, tend to fall back on Avons. Well priced and the near slick grip is as consistent as new, which is better than most. These mostly end up on our boring estate, but better than Falkens, Toyo CF1? we’re passable as were Michelin Primacy which lasted for ages.
Had some Avons on front of MX5 too, pretty decent on that and ran Toyo T1 at the back, good tyre for cheap, suited the MX5 well, but reviews seem quite split, so maybe not for all cars. Pirellis were rubbish, must save the good stuff for the very top end.
Honestly can’t remember what was on the 944, they were mid range and the car flattered them as there are no memorable losses of grip. Have a look on the TIPEC forum for some ideas of what others are running.
Now got a Panda 100hp, came with Goodyear Eagle F1, good but not amazing. Now got some Uniroyal Rainsport 2 on the front and turn in has got sharper.
As you can see, not really tried anything premium, but not had anything to fully exploit them. Might have tried some Michelin Sport on the 944 if we kept it for longer and did then in its size.
maccruiskeenFull Memberand the crap budget tyres that were on it when I bought it were terrifying, especially in the cold and/or wet.
Its also how good they are in very wet weather. Sometimes you only find out the hard way.
My sprinter came with a set of rear tyres which – and I shit you not – would spin out if I changed down from 6th to 5th on the motorway on damp tarmac – not aquaplaning on standing water, just wet. 7m of van suddenly going diagonally in traffic. The first few times it happened I was sure I’d hit oil spills. In a bit of brilliant nominative determinism the brand name was ‘Achillies’
sweepyFree MemberMy first car was a mini (The old one) I got rid of the radial tyres and put cross ply on because in the words of 17yr old me- they slide better
**** 🙂
garage-dwellerFull MemberFor your mileage and car OP something good or premium. I reckon you’ll get better advice on an owner’s club forum.
I tend to go mid range on my ageing Mondeo. Ventus or Hankook typically as that’s what my usual garage hold and they’re good enough. I had conti sport contacts for a long time. Better grip overall but not in all conditions than the mid range ones I use now and there was a cost and fuel economy difference.
The thing with tyres though is looking at what they are designed to do well. Ive had hire cars with energy efficient tyres in the past that felt like they wouldn’t stick if you covered them and the road in contact adhesive. Of course could be the cars steering etc.
I remember Pirelli P6000s being very expensive, good wearing and much maligned by hothatch ists for wet weather grip back in the early 2000s – they’ve possibly been changed since. They worked well on my Passat, less suitable for my 306 (which got track use periodically).
My Good Year Eagle F1s of the same era had shed loads more dry grip but wore out faster than I could eat a pack of crisps.
Cost the same a set…
SpeshpaulFull MemberI’ve had many sets of Avons, mid range, wear well, and grip well.
ZZ5’s are current OEM on Morgans.
Might be worth checking outtimbaFree MemberI tend to go for brands made by a well-known group, which might suit your driving style and wallet. Continental, for example, includes Uniroyal, Semperit, Barum, and Viking amongst others. Big-brand research and backing at a reasonable price
sharkbaitFree MemberI presume your car is not under warranty, but if it is (or you are thinking about taking out a Porsche extended warranty) then you need to have N0 rated tyres fitted.
CougarFull MemberNeed to new rear tyres for my boxter, and apparently the ones on the car at the moment are cheap budget rubbish with no place on a high performance car. That said I drive like a grandad and as such at no point have I ever thought I needed more grip on the rear as I slowly round a corner.
I’m sorry but I have to ask; why do you have a “a high performance car” if you “drive like a grandad”? Genuine question, I’m not trolling. I just don’t understand why you’d pay a massive premium to run something like that if you’re not going to use any of that performance.
BadlyWiredDogFull Member+ 1 for some of the model-specific comments already made above via a good owners forum. Different tyres work on different cars – the current fave on my outmoded Corrado are Bridgestone RE002s for example along with Conti Premium Contacts.
If you’re really not pushing the car at all, I’d say it still makes good sense to get decent tyres, particularly on something like a Boxster just for general safety reasons, but you probably don’t need to fret over the ‘on the limit’ type criteria that the likes of Evo focus on.
I’d say look at the Autoexpress annual tyre reviews, but they do tend to focus more on middle of the road hatchbacks and STW estates than sports cars.
I’m sorry but I have to ask; why do you have a “a high performance car” if you “drive like a grandad”? Genuine question, I’m not trolling. I just don’t understand why you’d pay a massive premium to run something like that if you’re not going to use any of that performance.
I can’t answer for the OP, obviously, but I guess some people like the feel and image of a nice sports car rather than an iconic turbo diesel estate plus Boxsters, in particular, are going for relative peanuts these days. Round here you see a whole load of Porsches and the like being driven pretty sedately. Personal choice, a bit like buying a Santa Cruz carbon wonder bike then pottering around like an old granny maybe.
imnFull MemberI presume your car is not under warranty, but if it is (or you are thinking about taking out a Porsche extended warranty) then you need to have N0 rated tyres fitted.
Irrespective of warranty, for insurance to be valid isn’t it the case that tyres with the the correct speed rating must be fitted?
The topic ‘Car Road tyres…worth the extra cost of going premium?’ is closed to new replies.