I can see where you;re coming from and the problem is how it’s investigated – if it;s investigated properly then someone can evaluate if the injury was caused by poor trail design – the solution being to redesign the trail – or by user ineptitude – the solution being to point and laugh like Nelson Muntz 🙂
alterntaively the “investigation” may be cursory and may simply involve someone making the decision that it;s all dangerous and should be closed
I’ve seen the latter happen when a busy body reported “illegal” jumps in a local park. The council sent a bulldzer to flatten them and when asked why, responded “the jumps were built in a dangerous fashion”. Well, they weren’t, they were very well constructed jumps that required a degree of skill to use. The guy driving the bulldozer would probably have hurt jimself badly if he’d have ridden them but that would have been due to user ineptitude not poor trail design / construction
in this case, the trails have been designed and built with the participation (or at least knowledge) of the council so I’d like to think it would be investigated properly