If you were asked to take some photo's of an indoor conference eg. some of the speakers, some group shots and maybe some of the audience.
What lens & settings would you recommend?
Ta in advance.
Chat Forum
[closed]
Question for the Photographers
-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
Depends on lost of factors!
How dark is it?
Can you go outside for the groups?
What cameras?
What lenses do you already own?
What is the end use of the images?
Whay are you unsure of settings?
"M" all the way if you really need to know.
Sound like the proverbial poisoned chalice to me, & it sounds like you're completely out of your depth with this one.Tell them to book a professional and stop dicking about.
Posted 2 years ago # -
How dark is it? Can't really say just now.
Can you go outside for the groups? Only if it's not snowing.
What cameras? 40d
What lenses do you already own? I've only got a 17-40mm with me, but I may be able to borrow some more.
What is the end use of the images? Just to record the day - not for promotional uses.
Whay are you unsure of settings? I'm not, but some things just work best and I was just looking for some recommendations.
"M" all the way if you really need to know.
Sound like the proverbial poisoned chalice to me, & it sounds like you're completely out of your depth with this one. Thanks.Tell them to book a professional and stop dicking about .
Posted 2 years ago # -
"M" all the way if you really need to know.
you want to use M but you don't know enough to work out what the settings should be ? Let the camera decide for you and bracket for security
Or use the display on the back to see what looks right. It might be as well to use a flash bounced off the ceiling if it's white or grey
Posted 2 years ago # -
Ti29er... you can be a real knob re. photography can't you?
To the OP... can you use flash and do you have an external flash? 40D is pretty good by all accounts on higher ISO settings, I'd be happy bumping it up to at least 800 and maybe even 1600 if all you're looking to do is record the day, not looking for massive blow-ups or 'professional' pixel peeping perfection. That should give you a decent shutter speed and with a 17-40L you should get good results... an IS lens might be nice though, I use the 17-55mm F2.8 IS which is superb in my opinion
Posted 2 years ago # -
you can be a real knob re. photography can't you?
asking "what settings?" reveals such catastrophic naiviety his reaction was quite apt
Posted 2 years ago # -
I may have given the false impression I was going to tell you how to do my job.
I won't ask how to do your job, so why do you want to know (even the basics) of how to do my job?Simon is 100% accurate in saying "catastrophic naiviety ".
Book a prfessional and you'll be a far happier person IMHO.
Posted 2 years ago # -
if you have to ask the question then you really are better off passing the work to somebody who knows the answer and the answer to all the other problems/issues that may arise on the shoot.
"what lens?"
you are planning on taking only one? then a really fast one (minimum 2.8 all the way) that goes from about 17 to 300 with image stabilisation and tilt/shift built in.Posted 2 years ago # -
Oh dear, photography threads do seem to bring out the worst of STW.
Why would he want to spend hundreds of pounds on a professional just to get a record of the day?
A reasonably fast lens might be handy as the light might not be that great, but shooting wide open will be no good for big group or audience shots where you want more depth of field. You will need to try high ISOs for those shots - but as said if it's just to be a record a bit of grainyness won't matter.
That's all in my inexpert amateur opinion btw.
Posted 2 years ago # -
"M" all the way if you really need to know.
Of course, manual exposure selection doesn't magically make for better images, unless you're working in uniform lighting like Ti29er and inter shot consistency is important. It can result in better exposure if you know more than the camera does. Correct exposure is only one aspect of photography, and may be a needless distraction in many circumstances, particularly if the scene contrast is low. By the time you've weighed up depth of field, camera shake, subject movement, noise etc, the moment may be lost
Posted 2 years ago # -
If you're shooting individual people or small groups and you want to flatter them and put them at easy by standing a bit further away, use a moderate focal length telephoto, say an 80mm to 100mm.
Get the best flash you can afford - hire one if you want to - and mount it off the camera slightly to the side or bounce off the ceiling to avoid the startled look.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I'd use my gf1 with the 20mm lens, it would easily handle that situation even in poor light.
That said if you are feeling out of your depth step down and get someone else to do it and maybe tag along with them?
Posted 2 years ago # -
Oh!
When I use "M" everything looks fantastic!
(Back to hours of PP for me, looking at this fantastic sun shine, I think a 3hr ride is called for to blow away those February blues)
Posted 2 years ago # -
just recording the day, use a compact, stop worrying and get pissed at the bar with everyone else
Ti29er, the guy asked for advice, he did not say "i intend to steal bread from your table, show me how to do it"
PS you get february blues in march??
Posted 2 years ago # -
I'd use my gf1 with the 20mm lens, it would easily handle that situation even in poor light.
yes dear, we know your camera is magic but he doesn't have one! BTW is 20mm a 'standard' focal length for 4/3rds cameras ?
Posted 2 years ago # -
I had a 40D for a couple of years, and while the low light performance is OK, it's not great in poorly lit indoor areas. Either a couple of desk lamps with 100w bulbs directed into reflectors/diffusers aimed at the subject, or a proper flash gun with a diffuser or bounced off wall/ceiling would really help. If you have access to the venue then it's worth taking a couple of people in their and trying a few photos with different lighting to see what the image quality is like.
You may get away with using 800 iso, but I wouldn't use 1600 iso as it can be really quite grainy. Don't expect the pop up flash on the camera to be any use for subjects more than 2-3m away from you, even at 800 iso.
If you are using flash then check your white balance setting too. If the room lights are incandecant (orangy light) or fluroescent (blue/green light) and you are using a flash (which produces very white light) then you may get some funny colours showing that can be tricky to sort in post processing (even if you shoot in RAW).
Posted 2 years ago # -
For the first time, I find myself agreeing with Ti29er..... Does.....Not.....Compute.....
If the company just want snapshots then yes, go for it. If they want properly exposed and balanced images, taken in tricky mixed light, then hire a pro who will likely turn up with a number of speedlights and give you decent results.
It's always difficult - as soon as your boss knows you have a digital camera you're put upon to assume the role of a pro tog for no extra cash - happened to me in my student job and put me in a horribly uncomfortable position as I just wasn't good enough to do what they wanted (tried anyway and I now look back at the results and cringe!!).
Posted 2 years ago # -
Oh dear, photography threads do seem to bring out the worst of STW.
because everyone has a camera therefore they are an expert in photography.
Posted 2 years ago # -
jeez. Thanks for some of the responses. I'm not going to be a pro, don't want to be- i was only looking for some tips.
I apologise if I offended some, maybe I should have asked Question for Amateur Photographers.
Posted 2 years ago # -
"M" all the way if you really need to know.
I recommend "P" - the Professional setting.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I apologise if I offended some
it was more that the question was roughly analagous to "I'm doing the coast-to-coast tomorrow, on a fixie obviously, any tips, what tyres etc ?"
Posted 2 years ago # -
apologise if I offended some
it was more that the question was roughly analagous to "I'm doing the coast-to-coast tomorrow, on a fixie obviously, any tips, what tyres etc ?"
I thought some of the responses where roughly analagous to "cause you've got a spanner doesn't mean you're a mechanic, do not attempt to use it, take it to a garage, you will die a horrible death, in fact don't even ask a question about it as it show's how much an ignoramus you truly are. Thicko'
Posted 2 years ago # -
just do what I do - take lots and lots of shots and hopefully a few will come out right
Posted 2 years ago # -
Hope my response didn't come accross like that - we all have to learn... Just that learning on company time, paid or unpaid is perhaps not the best time to be building your skillzzz, as I discovered to my cost.
Posted 2 years ago # -
All the OP wanted was some pointers on the technical aspects. All of which can be read in books or found on the internet - so he/she doesn't need to be put down by the STW "photgraphers", it's not a black art! Being technically good does not always make a good photographer.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Hmm I'd tend to agree that you don't do commissioned work until you know you're able to do it. If he was asking how to rebuild his shocks plenty would be willing to lend a hand, if he was asking how to rebuild a customers shocks people would be a little more reluctant and suggest he leaves it to someone more capable.
Of course if he's over-stated the role here and he's just grabbing a few shots and wants to do it right, some of the responses are a little OTT, but it's hard to tell from the OP.
Pro photogs tend to be very touchy about people muscling in on their business with a half decent camera, which is fair enough I suppose, but their work should say more than enough to make its value obvious over an amateur.
Posted 2 years ago # -
it's not a black art!
but neither can it be quickly taught in a forum post
Posted 2 years ago # -
Agreed, I'm well aware of the principles of it and approximate value ranges for situations, I've been playing around seriously for several years now, but I'd definitely not put myself forward for official work as I'd hate to dissappoint.
Posted 2 years ago # -
+1 on Simon and coffeeking.
I do
scrapemake my living out of photography and yes, there are times when I worry about the rise of talented amateurs / weekend warriors "muscling in" but as you say CK, the end results are what matters and my clients hopefully recognise the advantages of paying the going rate....Anyhoo, not going to hijack as that's a whole 'nother debate
I reckon there's been some good advice on this thread - Ti-29er has been as abrupt and outspoken as ever (perhaps you could word things a little less, erm, confrontationally?), but as I said earlier, he's got a fair point.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Photography is easy, just spend as much money as you can on the kit and it will do it all for you!
Oh, apart from the composition thing, which requires a bit of 'creativity'. Having said that, half the people I've worked with who claim to be professional photographers don't seem to know where this setting is on the camera!
Posted 2 years ago # -
Yet again, Ti29er demonstrates perfectly why most people won't "book a professional and stop dicking about."
When I use "M" everything looks fantastic!
Only when you close your eyes whilst looking at the results...
As others have said, the differing white balance may be the most difficult issue to deal with. As said, a decent flash and a diffuser may solve this sufficiently in a real-world attainable-now sort of way, if the photos only have to be a record of the day.
Pro photogs tend to be very touchy about people muscling in on their business with a half decent camera, which is fair enough I suppose, but their work should say more than enough to make its value obvious over an amateur.
+several to this. Something worrying messrs Ti29er and MrSmith?
Thankfully not all pro togs are like these two...
Posted 2 years ago # -
When I use "M" everything looks fantastic!
he was joking
Posted 2 years ago # -
"several to this. Something worrying messrs Ti29er and MrSmith?"
not at all. the kind of work i do isn't really something amateurs get involved in.
I guess high st portrait and wedding photographers are competing more with camera club members and a dslr.Posted 2 years ago # -
It's funny how on Talk Photography if people ask a similar question they just get helpful answers - there are even whole threads with suggested ISO/aperture settings for specific football stadiums etc
Pro photogs tend to be very touchy about people muscling in on their business with a half decent camera, which is fair enough I suppose, but their work should say more than enough to make its value obvious over an amateur.
+1. It's funny though, it doesn't seem to apply to other professions - you don't see pro footballers whinging about people willing to turn out on a Sunday for free for their local team.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I guess high st portrait and wedding photographers are competing more with camera club members and a dslr.
From some of the photos I've seen, I'm not surprised they're worried. I know one or two very good pro togs. I have seen many whose work could be bettered by a drunk student with a mobile phone.
If was a pro tog, I'd aim my complaints about 'ruining the business' squarely at those charging £2k for a wedding then screwing it up, rather than an enthusiastic amateur doing it as a favour or for pennies...
It's funny how on Talk Photography if people ask a similar question they just get helpful answers - there are even whole threads with suggested ISO/aperture settings for specific football stadiums etc
+1
Posted 2 years ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
