http://www.cyclesurgery.com/pws/UniqueProductKey.ice?ProductID=CLAK0001KK&utm_source=tt&utm_medium=email&utm_term=september11&utm_campaign=TT102

Don’t know how good they are, but looks like a great price.

I saw those and thought ‘they look like an spd sandle with a wetsuit boot inside them, I think I’ll pass’.

Which, if everyone feels that way, might explain the cheapness 🙂

Lake generally make decent boots and shoes – I’d try them

But …………
http://www.mtbr.com/cat/mtb-apparel-and-protection/shoes/lake/mx140/prd_436358_144crx.aspx

I’ve got some, which I bought from CS in the spring. Not used them yet though.

I think the ones they’re selling are simple velcro strips, not the boa system.

There’s only two reviews there, and one of them is..

After the 1st ride in them I broke the left BOA lacing system during a gnarley dismount…

uplink & realman, that is a different boot. The MX140 (which has been discontinued) has a boa closure. These LX140s look like velcro. Haven’t seen them before – I assume they’ve been dug out of a dark corner of some warehouse. Lake have been using the “MX” designation for mtb shoes for a while now so not sure what kind of riding these are even aimed at?

velcro + snow = boots off

🙁

Rather like the new Tevas that are being advertised down the side of that MTBR link!

On what planet is £136 ‘super cheap’??

Was: £135.99 Now: £54.40

Still not super cheap IMO but there you go…

On what planet is £136 ‘super cheap’??

That planet where people can read 😉

good point well made – serves me right for getting a crafty read whilst at work!

Epic fail.

Not the greatest of soles for winter mud though?
Still decent PSA