Nowt wrong with appreciation of older music
Many ‘music-lovers’ (no reference to anyone here) purchase music in a way that fashion-lovers buy clothes. New is essential. Old is meh. Unless it’s old-new -‘ie a new artist doing old’ stuff, no matter how poorly and devoid of context/sincerity. A little like the popular fiction vs classical literature thing. ‘Old music’ (in the eyes of the young or of those trying to hold on to this particular quality of youth) is compartmentalised away with ‘old people’. So while (say) Nina Simone’s words and sentiment about ‘Mississippi’ are still glaringly relevant today, and even if her musical talent far and away outstrips any handful of whining, self-conscious, vapid millennial mannikins …. she’s ‘old music’. For old people. See also any recording artist up until last Thursday. Some will only measure talent and sentiment by the clothes it wears.
It’s a tragedy of the age. IMO. But then again, I’m old.
I’ve always thought the comparison against Nirvana is unnecessary, they’re all good. What’s wrong with having more good things
Because tribalism amd identity politics.
Oasis vs Blur
Marmite vs Bovril