Viewing 9 posts - 41 through 49 (of 49 total)
  • Paying drug addicts to be sterilised
  • ballsofcottonwool
    Free Member

    No suprise on the American attitude of cure rather than prevention.

    bassspine
    Free Member

    I listened to the interview on R4 this morning.

    To say that it is eugenics is to say you misunderstand the meaning of the word.

    I don't totally agree with Barbara wossname, but I see her point – it's not just a question of the rights of the mother, it's also a question of the what kind of life a junkies (effectively orphan) child is going to have.

    tazzymtb
    Full Member

    rather than paying for drug addicts to be sterilized due to the fact that they can't look after kids could we add/replace it with people who shop at iceland due to the fact that feeding that frozen crap to your kids is probably far more damaging in the long term. We'll end up with a society who look up to kerry katona as a role model otherwise.

    on a serious note, paying for sterilization seems just seems wrong, either be a proper nazi and enforce it or offer rehabilitation and support for the drug addict who may actually make them a decent parent in long term.

    El-bent
    Free Member

    there are 6,801,702,680 humans alive, and the number keeps rising, how many more before we question the 'right' to reproduce?

    While there will eventually have to be something done about rising population levels across the planet, whatever those measures are they should be applied equally to all, not just a chance to sterilize those who we deem as undesirable by the "civilized" standards of the day.

    A Pandora's box opened…where will it end?

    NathanG
    Free Member

    Swings and roundabouts aint it. I've known 100's of heroin and/or crack addicts have their children taken off them at birth but i've known a handful, and it is that, a handful make a change for the better. All this woman is doing is offering up a solution much the same as projects that offer substitute medication for addicts, be it Diamorphine (as they have in Scotland), Methadone, Subutex or Antibuse for alcohol users. Its just a different take on an age old problem.

    Millions of children are born with a habit and they have to go through the same detox as adults but its easier in some ways with children as no one ever dies from a 'cluck'. The same unfortunately cannot be said for alcohol.

    Also as a thought Alan Turing the fella who was instrumental in providing a formula for the concept of algorithm's was chemically castrated because he was gay and subsequently killed himself. The man was a genius and because of his sexual orientation lost his job etc etc.

    jj55
    Full Member

    I also heard the prog on radio 4, and she talked an awful lot of sense. They offer to reverse the op later on if the person wished to change their mind, but they have not had one take up the offer. On the face of it it is bordering on right wing eugenics, but when you heard this passionate & very caring person talk about the affects of drug addiction on unborn & totally unwanted babies, and how these children suffer terribly when born and have to be weaned off the drugs it was heartbreaking. and if all that didn't make you think again, they had done a study and 'costed' how much it took to look after one of these children from birth right through until he died of neglect at the age of 3 – $4m! I know we should not put a price on life, but c'mon someone has to say it!A very difficult subject, but one that needs to be discussed

    surfer
    Free Member

    No suprise on the American attitude of cure rather than prevention.

    Its not an either/or debate. Drug addicts get significant help in the UK and there are countless bodies striving to reduce drug use and dependency. For some this will never be enough and a reversible method that restrict child birth for some would be appropriate.

    Hammo
    Free Member

    You could pay them to be art –
    http://www.santiago-sierra.com/200014_1024.php

    Much more useful.

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    I see the other end of the issue – MrsSwadey is the one who has to get the court order to take the baby away…whatever you think, it's not as easy as it sounds, legally, ethically or personally.

    I can't help thinking that either some people need to be encouraged/cajoled into not having more kids, or we need to make it more straight forward to remove the kids immediatly and give them to some decent loving families to adopt while they are still young enough not to be damaged.

    Might also solve some of the problems for those losing out in the IVF lottery as well.

Viewing 9 posts - 41 through 49 (of 49 total)

The topic ‘Paying drug addicts to be sterilised’ is closed to new replies.