Viewing 35 posts - 1 through 35 (of 35 total)
  • Panoramic photography
  • TP
    Free Member

    Which digital camera and software for panoramic photography? I’d like the output to be good enough to hang on the wall.

    Thanks all.

    roadie_in_denial
    Free Member

    Whatever you can afford…photostitch and gimp for software…and remember to pivot the camera through the centrepoint of the lense.

    TP
    Free Member

    Cheers,

    How do you achieve pivoting through the centrepoint of the lense rather than the point where the camera attaches to the tripod? Are good compact cameras up to the job or should I save up for a compact system camera such as the canon EOS M? I enjoy photography and can use a camera in its manual settings but can’t justify the cost of digital SLR.

    bencooper
    Free Member

    The proper way is a nodal point tripod head – I use a Nodal Ninja 3 – but for landscapes and especially if you’re not doing 360-degree panoramas you can get away with a normal tripod or even doing it handheld.

    jad
    Free Member

    Would agree with that and do all my panoramics using a standard tripod head.

    Make sure everything is in manual so the exposure doesn’t change for each shot. Set ISO, shutter speed and aperture. If you can, meter for the brightest part of the scene then lock it before doing the sweep to avoid excessive blown highlights. Manual focus is a good idea too.

    nedrapier
    Full Member

    I think if your camera’s good enough, and your eye’s good enough, plugging it into Microsoft ICE to sort out the stitching gives great results.

    These fall down on the camera (just a blackberry) so wouldn’t be good enough to blow up too big, but I think they came out pretty well, considering. ( still kicking myself I didn’t take a proper camera!) Some banding on the 1st one, but a short while in photoshop would sort those out. clicky for bigger.

    Edit, plus what jad said about controlling exposure and focus throughout.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Tripod. Windows Live Photo Gallery and the panorama plugin.

    (view image…)

    TP
    Free Member

    Great information. Thanks.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    It’s not that important to do the pivoting thing. I’ve never done it and got decent enough panoramas. With a compact as well as a SLR. Didn’t even use a tripod here:


    Trail Peak Road by molgrips, on Flickr

    Make sure everything is in manual so the exposure doesn’t change for each shot

    You can get around that with a compact. All cameras I’ve used set the focus and exposure when you press the shutter half way down. So you can point at the middle of your panorama, half press the shutter, then move to the far side, press it all the way down to take the picture, then as long as you keep it half way down between pics it’ll keep the same exposure.

    jad
    Free Member

    I also tend to use a focal range between 35 & 50mm. Wide angle panoramas don’t do it for me and can look very strange.

    Also, I always rotate the camera to portrait mode.

    TP
    Free Member

    nedrapier – Is that St Kilda? You just took the camera phone to St Kilda? Haven’y made it out there yet but its definitely on the to do list. Great pictures regardless.

    MrSmith
    Free Member

    You only need a nodal slide if you have objects close to the camera, using one avoids parallax errors.
    for landscapes with no objects in the foreground like the examples above you can get away without one.

    nedrapier
    Full Member

    TP, yup, I know! Totally daft. I was there on a work trip, and slightly surplus to requirements, so I didn’t want to act like a total tourist, taking photos all the time. I did anyway, though, they’re just not very good! 2nd one is Plockton.

    ampthill
    Full Member

    I’ve tried many stitchers and find ICE brilliant

    I do find it much easier to use RAW files from the camera so i can sort out consistent white balance at home. I also correct exposre and lift shadows aetc. before stitching

    Hugin is good as well but less good at the stitching. It has many more out puts

    I now often start in ICE out put as a cylinder then put it into Hugin. This gives things like this


    dune.jpg by John Clinch, on Flickr

    Or stitching for proper panos this was done in ICE


    More Stony Floods by John Clinch, on Flickr

    Hugin I think


    Melbecks.jpg by John Clinch, on Flickr

    Hugin


    mountaincloudsstack by John Clinch, on Flickr

    hugin


    Ludlow Castle by John Clinch, on Flickr

    This last was in photo shop. Some times its nice to turn the blending off


    st pauls pano cylinderweb by John Clinch, on Flickr

    stuartie_c
    Free Member

    Newer Sony cameras have an “auto panorama” function which, despite being the most vulgar form of cheating, give pretty good results in-camera.


    kinbreak-2 by stuartie_c, on Flickr

    (Click for full size)

    dobo
    Free Member

    Sony TX5 compact tough camera auto panorama setting handheld on a mtb ride at Thassos. Its cheating i guess but im not really a fan of panorama pictures, that said i like some of the above. Dunno if the quality is good enough or not for full size, its had a small edit to adjust the colours so not washed out, theres some imperfections but not bad really.


    DSC00542a by dobs1973, on Flickr

    Snowy mtb ride the other day 🙂 pretty dull picture to be fair but was nice at the time


    DSC03179a by dobs1973, on Flickr

    TP
    Free Member

    Great pictures guys. I’m feeling inspired and lucky to be living in Scotland. Are sony the only ones to do it in camera. I assume the image can be tweaked on the computer if needed.

    TP
    Free Member

    I always tended towards normal ratios but I now find myself living on the edge of the Cairngorms and I think the landscape would really lend itself to the wider aspect.

    trout
    Free Member

    Thanks for this thread and the pointer to ICE
    just grabbed the camera on auto and held in portrait sat on a swivel chair and clicked
    popped it into ICE and bingo

    idiot friendly 😆

    nedrapier
    Full Member

    ampthill, those are fantastic!

    TP, I’ve just bought a Lumix LX7 which does that. Only tried it once on a very bright, low sun winter’s day and it didn’t really work. Not surprised, though! I expect the Sony cleverness would have struggled as well. And me trying to cobble something together manually with enough range.

    nedrapier
    Full Member

    nice, trout. Fun, isn’t it?

    It does struggle when the horizon’s not obvious. I’d like to know how to pull this one up on the right. Any ideas anyone?

    And you need to remember to take enough photos!

    TP
    Free Member

    I’m on a Mac. I think that counts ICE out? Whatever I use needs to be idiot friendly too. While I can take a picture occasionally my computing skills could be worked on.

    TP
    Free Member

    I like the St Pauls and Snow asymmetric efforts. A great scrap/cuttings book look.

    CountZero
    Full Member

    How to Shoot Really Big Panoramas (10 Pictures)

    How to Shoot Really Big Panoramas

    bencooper
    Free Member

    Nedrapier – easiest is to just crop and rotate to get a horizontal horizon – I do it in Lightroom but any image processing software will be able to do it.

    Some of mine:

    But what I really do them for is for virtual reality panoramas like this:

    http://www.catchingphotons.co.uk/panoramas/output/Inverkip%20Pano.html

    coffeeking
    Free Member

    And remember to lock your exposure somewhere around the middle of the whole scene’s lighting, and focus on your subject and not re-focus/re-meter each shot

    coffeeking
    Free Member


    Mull from Easdale by j.buckle, on Flickr

    9000×3000 pixels, IIRC a 12 shot stitch.

    user-removed
    Free Member

    Lots to be going on with but can I also throw Autostitch into the mix? It’s free and incredibly good. I use it for professional panos for visual impact assessments.

    You do need to spend an hour playing with the parameters to get a decent sized image out of it, but the stitching is better than anything else I’ve tried.

    brakes
    Free Member

    this was done yesterday on my phone
    simple but very effective function

    CountZero
    Full Member

    Vulgar, cheating, phone camera single shot: 😉

    The Ridgeway and the Herepath, single-sweep iPhone photo:

    DezB
    Free Member

    Used ICE too, after it was recommended on here. The Canon has a stitch feature, but ICE makes it so simple and the results are pretty seamless.

    nbt
    Full Member

    Loads on here

    http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/show-your-panoramic-pictures

    I use Autostitch, might have to have a look at ICE

    smett72
    Full Member

    Another vote for ICE, much better than the software that came with my Canon DLSR. Very simple to use as well.

    I didn’t realise ICE did RAW either. Going to have to give it a try.

    TP
    Free Member

    Right then, I’ve got some software and will take some pictures this weekend with the wife’s camera. If the results are any good I might even post one up here. The bar has been set high though…

    ampthill
    Full Member

    I didn’t realise ICE did RAW either. Going to have to give it a try.

    I may have given that impression

    sorry i convert the RAW in lightroom first.

Viewing 35 posts - 1 through 35 (of 35 total)

The topic ‘Panoramic photography’ is closed to new replies.