I gave up after q2! “They” seem to have assumed that I “traditionally expect” Ordnance Survey to provide electronic functionality. I don’t. I can’t believe “OS” think this, so presume the questionnaire was made by the “OS digital team” and the feature set they’ve listed is what they think I want. I’ve been involved in designing a lot of apps and this is a back to front approach. As a map user and “technologist” I’ll happily help OS design a suite of features that are genuinely of value but not in a questionnaire which can only ever lead you to a “controlled answer”.
For the record – here are the features of OS mapping that *I* believe people value:
– accuracy
– legibility
– coverage
– level of detail (ie. different map scales for different “tasks”)
In terms of printed maps the format / size is popular (although may not be ideal for all users!). The cost is just OK but generally perceived as expensive. I’m not sure how cost effective (or profitable) your custom map printing is – but one major irritation for anyone is having to cover multiple maps – if it makes business sense there is a major opportunity, and if those are easily highlighted to show intended routes etc all the better. Offering different print sizes would also stop me carrying a huge map that I only use an A3 portion of.
You are not strava, garmin or endomondo etc so don’t try to compete with an installed user base for planning, logging and sharing routes: look at how you can compliment their offerings (via APIs?) where your strengths add value to their products and vice versa.
You are also not google so I’m not sure your “POI”, “Events” etc can be as up-to-date or meaningful/content rich as theirs. Why reinvent the wheel and DON’T dare clutter my lovely map with crap I’ve not asked for or interested in!
The features I want on my phone are not the same as I want on my desktop.
Your value lies in your dataset – controversially, I’m not sure (and I don’t have the information I would need to support this decision) that it makes sense for OS to develop apps of its own. Every electronic offering you’ve tried in the past has been a bit “meh”. You can’t be all things to all people, and even walkers and cyclists have different needs. If I was on the OS board I would be questioning whether OS would not be better off developing (and simplifying) its licensing model [and possibly its APIs, support infrastructure, security and architecture as necessary] to facilitate “any” developer fully utilising the potential value my 4 listed points OS mapping brings to any mapping App (web/desktop or mobile) rather than thinking we could invent our own “ultimate map app”.