The 17 is a slightly strange new size. I recall the 17 was only made though to cater for certain specific features (seat posts or combination of post and new head tube, my memory fails me – there was a very specific reason for it, so that certain things could be used that couldn’t previously on a 16 mebbe – something like that) so I’m not sure they changed all of the frame proportionally.
Actually just checked the TT length etc, the effective TT is the same as the 18 and so is the wheelbase.
So while you get reduced standover clearance, the bike will still be same in terms of reach etc. (actual TT is 6mm shorter which seems to equate to identical effective TT).
Anyway – I’m 5’9, 32 inside leg, and on an 18″ with 60mm stem. I tried both 16 and 18 – couldn’t decide, so took for LBS advice and went for 18. Love it. Use it for just about everything.
Suspect I could also ride 16 happily too and it might be more ‘chuckable’? if such a phrase exists.
PS. Stem was changed to 60mm to shorten cockpit a little for me rather than stick with stock 90mm. That was the main trade off between 16 / 18 for me.