Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Opinions on Trek EX (2009)
  • makecoldplayhistory
    Free Member

    I’m off to test ride a 2014 bike to see if it fits but am thinking about getting a 2009 bike I’m just after the masses opinion.

    I’m getting frame and (Float) forks if I like it and will run XTR/X0 3×9. Wide bars, 80mm stem, Tech 2 disks, HOPE / 321 rear and 717 front.

    Does that sound like a spec that matches the frame. I’m 5′ 7″ with pretty normal proportions and looking for a sit-up position bike. My current hardtail’s stretched and not doing my lower back any good.

    Most of my riding can be done (or is done at the moment) on a carbon hardtail at the moment so I’m not looking for a gnarpoon – to use the MBUK vernacular. Something for 2 hour-ish XC riding but nice and comfortable.

    Thanks all

    fr0sty125
    Free Member

    80mm stem aren’t they for steering a canal boat?

    GHill
    Full Member

    I have a Fuel Ex 8 from 2009. It’s a pretty capable bike that easily suits either an XC whippet build or something a bit tougher (trail?).

    Tends to eat shock bushings though, and the ABP quick release lever is easy to bend.

    makecoldplayhistory
    Free Member

    Frosty – just checked. It’s a 65mm.

    GHill – Eat how quickly? I know that’s a ‘how long is a piece of string’ question. I live in Thailand so guess bringing some spares could be a good idea. Are they expensive to buy? Are they readily available? Do you need specialist equipment / skills to fit them? This’ll be my first full sus in almost a decade.

    Mine’ll be a slightly “tougher” build, I guess as that’s the parts I have. The drive train’s pretty light weight but the brakes and wheels aren’t going to be on an XC racer’s bike.

    Thanks

    warton
    Free Member

    I had the 2009 EX 9 and it was a very capable bike. quick enough on the flat / uphill, and flew downhill, i loved it

    Wozza
    Free Member

    I had a 2008/9 Fuel Ex 9.8, as above it was very very capable. That said, it cracked in about 4 places. Was easy to repair, but it now lives with a mate who’s 2/3rds my weight and rides it as often as a Scotsman gets a round in.

    I’d recommend an alloy one. To help with your sizing, mine was 16.5″ actual, with a 60mm stem. I’m 5’10.

    makecoldplayhistory
    Free Member

    The one I’m looking at is an alloy one. It’s 18.5″ (17.5″ actual) and the guy’s wife was my size.

    Thanks

    ichabod
    Free Member

    Great bike! – I had the 2010 one and no issue at all with bushings wearing.

    I would strongly consider going for the size down (17.5/16.5). I am the same height as you and was on the line between this one and the even smaller size!

    In the end the (17.5/16.5) was a good size for me with a shortish 60mm stem. Looking at the geo charts it is almost exactly the same reach and wheelbase as the size medium stumpy evo I have replaced it with. So in other words, the size you are looking at is more like a size large in stumpjumper terms!

    GHill
    Full Member

    Eat how quickly? I know that’s a ‘how long is a piece of string’ question. I live in Thailand so guess bringing some spares could be a good idea. Are they expensive to buy? Are they readily available? Do you need specialist equipment / skills to fit them?

    For me it’s been about every 6-9 months, I think the parts would come from a Fox suspension distributor, rather than anything to do with Trek specifically. They were pretty cheap (less than £5) but I’ve always got a Trek dealer to fit them so don’t know if it’s a difficult process.

    One word of warning, it’s quite easy to round the mounting bolt – getting replacements from Trek took about 6 weeks.

    dobiejessmo
    Free Member

    Above are right if you are 5″7 18.5″/17.5″ is to big for you.I have 13 one which is the size down to what you are looking at and i am 5″9 fits great.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

The topic ‘Opinions on Trek EX (2009)’ is closed to new replies.