Roomster – OK thanks for that. I read the post properly and actually it's more interesting than I first thought.
IMO Northface kit built a reputation around technically innovative and very capable kit. Their original Mountain Jacket was expensive but lovely and I still have one that I bought back in 1997. I've used it for everything; mountaineering, DH mountain biking (which is where it's employed now for winter use because it's so bloody tough) casual and even work use.
A few years after I bought this jacket and wore it for casual as well as outdoor use, I noticed a lot of other outdoor enthusiasts doing the same. Well why not, the stuff looked good and as well as performed well.
Then it all got carried away and people you'd never see out in the mountains started wearing their stuff and I think Northface cottoned on to this aspect of fashionable/rugged/outdoorsy/urbanite kit and decided that since no one was actually using their clothing for what it was originall designed for there was very little need to develop their kit to be technical capable. Sort of like the 'chelsea tractor/Range Rover/sloan ranger' equivalent of the outdoor clothing world and they kept the price high as well. At which point I largely stopped buying it.
Gore seem to have a much better position in the market, and in my mind at least, occupy the space that NorthFace once did; so technically capable kit, fit for purpose but also great to wear, if not a little pricey.