• This topic has 9 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by Earl.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • No Windows 9 ?
  • Earl
    Free Member

    I’m guessing its because ‘9’ pronounced in chinese is the same as ‘dog’ and china is a big market….

    Any other guesses?

    jota180
    Free Member

    It got shelved early in dev

    disco_stu
    Free Member

    Developers taking a little shortcut is probably the reason.

    “Microsoft dev here, the internal rumours are that early testing revealed just how many third party products that had code of the form

    if(version.StartsWith(“Windows 9”))
    { /* 95 and 98 */
    } else {
    and that this was the pragmatic solution to avoid that.”

    Earl
    Free Member

    what? so technically there was actually a Win9 and its hasn’t just been renamed Win10?

    jota180
    Free Member

    Nine would also be NO in German 🙂

    Flaperon
    Full Member

    https://searchcode.com/?q=if(version%2Cstartswith(%22windows+9%22)

    This is (sceptical look) possibly why. Lazy programming. Besides, “Windows 10” sounds better. Means it’s caught up with OS X.

    Earl
    Free Member

    stu – now that makes plenty of sense.

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    Any other guesses?

    Their whole version history is a mess. You’d think it would be a marketing nightmare for them but lets face it how hard is it to market the choice people make if they’ve decided not to make a choice. 🙂

    if(version.StartsWith(“Windows 9”))

    See, if you gave a toss you’d not go from 8 to 10, you’d go from 8 to a new version labelling system which you’ve given some thought to and future proofed so issues like that won’t come up again. Or you know you can just decide ‘**** it’. Presumably on the example they’re snookered going from 10 to 11 on the same basis. So windows 50 (or 5) next?

    Cougar
    Full Member

    We discussed this on another thread recently. Aside from Spinal Tap-esque marketing which is almost certainly the main reason, I suspect that the other driving force is to allow them to align their desktop product with Windows Phone releases.

    It’s a cute idea but I don’t buy the “if Windows version starts with 9” story. a) I’d be stunned if anyone ever detected versions in that way, the internal version of Windows 95 isn’t “95”, it’s “4.00.950” (W98 is 4.10.xx) so you’d say something like “if majorVersion==4”, and

    b) even if they did, I can’t for a second imagine that it’s would be such a big deal in 2014 as to influence Microsoft’s product naming.

    But yeah. It’s Windows 10 and not 9 because it’s 1 louder.

    Earl
    Free Member

    ok. I’m going back with the dog thing.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

The topic ‘No Windows 9 ?’ is closed to new replies.