Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 152 total)
  • NHS – where should it stop paying for services
  • crikey
    Free Member

    “But what I would question is why I was sent to a hospital so far away when there was one nearer”

    Probably because the centre you were taken to had more specialist experience in your type of injury. Or it could be that the local hospital had no spare beds…

    This is what I was on about.
    The centralisation of services can improve outcomes, but essentially places a greter amount of the problem of transport onto the patient.

    As far as beds being available….well now… If you accept that the NHS has to make savings, become more ‘efficient’, then the first thing you could look at is spare capacity. We used to be able to deal with surges in admissions because we had spare beds, but this is not the case anymore and this winter will prove to be an interesting one in terms of capacity, certainly in critical care, but also in other hospital departments.

    Sancho
    Free Member

    TJ
    its not a stupid statement, just a reflection of what I see in other countries around the world.
    The question is where do we draw the line, or should we not draw the line and provide everything free.
    Its a difficult topic.
    Again you are talking about discrimnation, and I dont follow your argument.
    Ethnicity and knowledge of a language are not the same.

    lunge
    Full Member

    do you not understand the differnce between going on holiday to a county and emigration?

    TJ, In undertand it fully, hence should I choose to emigrate to France for arguments sake I would make sure I learnt so speak French as I would be staying there for an extended period of time. If I didn’t I would understand that there would be problems in doing a wide variety of things including visiting a hospital.

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Yes – I emigrated and lived overseas and accepted that it was my responsibility to fit in, not the other way round. Plus it would have been very arrogant to have argued otherwise. I was also educated in Scotland but fear that discrimination will prevent my children doing the same.

    BTW – how would a centralised, planned NHS avoid political interference. How do you ensure economies of scale > diseconomies and watse?

    muppetWrangler
    Free Member

    Legally staff are not allowed to use friends or relatives as translators, even if the patient gives consent, its a big no no.

    I have no reason to doubt that what you say is correct, but going back to the original point, there just isn’t the money in the local healthcare trust to pay for translators in the numbers that would be required, staff have to make do with what they have available to them and sometimes that is a relative of the patient.

    mcboo
    Free Member

    Oh look you’ve got a little gang, bless. Judean People’s Front or those other guys?

    bol
    Full Member

    A few observations about translators, from my experience:
    1. It is the Police who spend more on translators than anyone else – should victims of crime foot the bill for their own translators too?

    2. In mental health, where I work, I would argue that it is much, much better to have an appropriately trained and competent translator than not. Apart from anything else, sorting out a translator might not be at the top of your priority list when you’re suicidal or having a psychotic episode. Either way, for all concerned, I’d rather each party knew what the other was saying.

    3. In some cases translators actually help integrate people who have been very isolated in their communities. Surely access to the services and facilities in the wider community are essential if we want people to integrate?

    crikey
    Free Member

    I have no reason to doubt that what you say is correct, but going back to the original point, there just isn’t the money in the local healthcare trust to pay for translators in the numbers that would be required, staff have to make do with what they have available to them and sometimes that is a relative of the patient.

    For things like ‘Are you warm enough?’, ‘have you got pain?’, ‘Do you know where you are?’ relatives can be a godsend, but for things like confidential medical information, consent for operations, anything with a medico-legal implication, relatives should not be used.

    I have been in a situation where an 8 year old girl was expected to translate for her mum who was about to have complex gynaecological surgery; I had to say that this was not acceptable and delay things by a few hours… just not right.

    Similarly, husbands cannot give consent for their wives surgery and so on.

    IanMunro
    Free Member

    Sorry I haven’t read though the above, but have we established if Andrew Lansley is racist yet?
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15164373

    mcboo
    Free Member

    Surely access to the services and facilities in the wider community are learning the local language is essential if we want people to integrate?

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    So McBoo – being shown up as racist, being unable to answer any points being put to you, altering your stance to an even more ridiculous one when the ridiculousness of your position is pointed out to you and childish insults to those who disagree with you.

    well done!

    Sancho
    Free Member

    Maybe if the service were provided at a cost and there were circumstances where the cost could be waived in the case of poverty.

    Its tricky and similar to the taxi thing.

    Some people on here have had need of a taxi to get to/from hospital and that service is available but have chosen to pay themselves.
    What if translation was a service that could be provided for a fee, then some people would take up the service others may make arrangements themselves.

    My point is would this save money to the NHS without compromising service. and not be considered racist.

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    Sancho – its still racist because its disadvantaging people on grounds of their ethnic background.

    It must be equal access to all

    muppetWrangler
    Free Member

    Crikey, I think you’ve cleared that up better than I could have hoped to. Mrs mW’s role is in aftercare so the language difficulties she is likely to face would generally fall into the former description rather then the latter example of the 8 year old girl.

    mcboo
    Free Member

    Is he always like this?

    bol
    Full Member

    Yep Mcboo, I think it’s good if people learn English. I guess it’s a bit of a chicken and egg thing isn’t it?

    Interestingly, I know a number of translators locally who decided to become a translator haing previously been on the receiving end of the service. They learned English and trained as translators.

    Fact is, we can look at it in a black and white Daily Mail vs Guardian type way, or we can accept that there is a massive amount of grey in the middle. In this instance I think that TJ is more right than you are though.

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Yes, seems so.

    Perhaps you might want to re-post the latest instalment cutting out the words – “So McBoo – being shown up as racist”. It would be most appropriate 😉

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Bol – I actually think that many people have sympathy with TJ’s view (I certainly do) but not with the absurd extremities that he takes to try to convince people (the “racist” cop out card, endless repetition etc)

    FunkyDunc
    Free Member

    “What if translation was a service that could be provided for a fee, then some people would take up the service others may make arrangements themselves”

    Its too complicated. You would have to means test people which would cost time and money in administration. The there is dealing with the complaints when you turn round and say sorry you dont qualify etc etc.

    Also and this may be a sweeping statement on my part, but those who could afford to pay would probably already speak English. Those who could not afford to pay would be probably be the ones who can not speak English, and I’m sure Human Rights would unfortunately come in to it as basically you would be restricting access to health care.

    This is why the NHS is so difficult. IMO it should be either pay for all or pay for none, personally I’m in favour of pay for all as I think its cheaper and more efficient in the long term.

    Oh and with regards to provided at cost. The prices I quoted earlier are at cost. The NHS doesnt add margin to the costs it recharges to other parts of the NHS.

    The social integration bit ie learning English isnt really an NHS issue, I guess its shared by the Council and Education Department.

    mcboo
    Free Member

    Wait a sec

    bol – Member
    Eight pages? Nine? This ones going to run a bit isn’t it?

    I love a bit of (not very) thinly veiled racism in the morning.

    Don’t come on being all matey fella……you’re the one that shouted RACIST to begin with. Care to elaborate? Let’s see if you can be any more convincing than Mrs Doubtfire up there.

    Sancho
    Free Member

    TJ
    I dont see how race is a factor for not learning the language of the country you live in.
    I can understand where foreign nationals who are visiting dont speak English, and often people who are not UK born citizens will not be fluent.
    But a UK born citizen I would expect to know English.

    So maybe its not a racist issue, more a matter of nationality and that then I dont think the NHS should foot the bill in all circumstances.

    crikey
    Free Member

    Were it a simple matter, we could offer translation as an added extra. As it stands, communication is an integral part of healthcare and we try to offer the best healthcare that we can, therefore…..we need to provide a service to help some people access healthcare.

    I don’t see it as a big issue really.

    Incidentally, has anyone seen the introductory talks that junior doctors get?

    The ones where bright shiny young doctors are helped to translate dialect sayings when they go to work in such foreign lands as Yorkshire or Newcastle?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/4688120.stm

    So give over with the ‘You should all speak perfect English’ stuff, Eh?

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    Sancho

    If you take an ation that disadvantages one group more than others then that action is prejudicial. If this group is defined by their ethnicity / nationality then its racist.

    Zulu-Eleven
    Free Member

    TJ – I fail to see the association between race and language

    I know lots of black people who can speak English, I know brown people who can speak English too, and yellow ones, and a whole load of mixes inbetween…

    Funnily enough I know shed loads of white people who can only speak French, and some who can only speak Polish, I even know some white people from Scotlandshire who could probably do with a translator too.

    I even know Black French people who can speak English, shock horror!

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    No correlation between ethnicity and english speaking Zulu?

    ahwiles
    Free Member

    how many inuit translators does the NHS have?

    if the answer is none, then are we racist against the inuit?

    should the NHS provide a translator in every hospital for every language?

    crikey
    Free Member

    Can we stop with the race thing now?

    Everyone has had a say, no one is going to change their minds, why not leave it there?

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    If you take an ation that disadvantages one group more than others then that action is prejudicial. If this group is defined by their ethnicity / nationality then its racist.

    So are Scottish Universities racist?

    The New Statesman:

    The Scottish fees policy is often wrongly perceived as anti-English (the Daily Mail refers to it as “the fees apartheid”) but it’s simply aimed at maximising revenue for universities….For the left, Scotland should serve as a reminder that tuition fees are a political (racist?) choice, not an economic necessity.

    mcboo
    Free Member

    Can we stop with the race thing now?

    Everyone has had a say, no one is going to change their minds, why not leave it there?

    Sure, soon as TJ and bol back off and acknowledge that screaming racist at me was a little over the top I will be happy to move on.

    I mean you guys should meet me…..I’m really quite nice.

    Zulu-Eleven
    Free Member

    No correlation between ethnicity and english speaking Zulu?

    No, there really isn’t when you think about it is there TJ.

    Last time I looked, Germany had both white and black people there, some of whom are unable to speak English, and some can 🙄

    crikey
    Free Member

    Mcboo, do you accept that there is a place for translation services within the NHS?

    mcboo
    Free Member

    crikey – Member
    Mcboo, do you accept that there is a place for translation services within the NHS?

    Yessir

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    mcboo – Member

    Can we stop with the race thing now?

    Everyone has had a say, no one is going to change their minds, why not leave it there?

    Sure, soon as TJ and bol back off and acknowledge that screaming racist at me was a little over the top I will be happy to move on.

    Perhaps you should back off and apologise.
    1) I did not “scream racist at you”
    2) you clearly were being racist and many of us agree

    its the unthinking insidious racism not the overt intended racism as I clearly stated and spent some time explaining to you.

    and as for the childish insults thrown my way?

    crikey – I will take your advice

    Edit – changed your view completely now have you? seems like it

    crikey
    Free Member

    Nice one, now TJ and bol, any chance of a reconciliatory post?

    Edit: not quite what I was thinking of…

    Sue_W
    Free Member

    Going back to the issue raised in the OP … 🙂

    Maybe the question isn’t ‘how can the NHS save money / what services should it cut’, but rather ‘does the NHS require greater funding to support a comprehensive, equitable health care service for all’? It seems to be a societal given that we now need to cut services to address the deficit, rather than consider what we should pay / contribute to support public services.

    We are living longer (but often with chronic conditions), and medical advances now mean that treatments are available for illnesses and conditions that previously would have killed someone. I guess from my ethical POV, if we (as in the medical / care professions) are able to do something that can aleviate suffering, then we should. And if that costs more money, then we increase what we contribute to the cost of that, especially from those that can afford to (and frankly that includes most of us who have a disposable income to spend on bike bits!)

    crikey
    Free Member

    I think the NHS requires a change in focus. As Z-11 suggested a while ago, primary care is the place to spend money, not in hospitals, try to keep people well rather than fix them.

    The tricky bit is that it requires a level of social input and prescriptive influence on lifestyles and life choices that is verging on the 1984ish…

    mcboo
    Free Member

    I didnt know I was a Kulak until TJ pointed it out to me.

    crikey
    Free Member

    You mean you’re bald and suck lollies all day?

    Oh….

    Sancho
    Free Member

    I see what you are saying.
    But disagree with you on this

    Sue_W
    Free Member

    crikey – I agree completely: one of the most effective ways of reducing costs and simultaneously minimising human suffering is through keeping people well in the first place.

    But as individuals and as a society, along with a lot of the emphasis in the medical sector, we are hugely resistant to this. I work on research related to the health benefits of physical activity / active lifestyles, and I do verge on dispair at some points.

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 152 total)

The topic ‘NHS – where should it stop paying for services’ is closed to new replies.