Just been out for an hour on it. First real test-ride.
Ride was purely XC, but that’s the majority of my riding anyway.
Doing some back to back measuring with the Giant XTC29 i’ve found that they’re now very very close in actual measurments for the ETT, BB>seat etc. The Yelli however FEELS a lot bigger. Not really sure why. the 50mm stem on the Yelli has brought it down almost to the size of the Medium Giant with a 90mm stem.
The one MAJOR plus though is the BB height of the Yelli compared to the Giant. I’ve got one particular tight XC trail by my house which was great on the Bionicon but it’s rubbish on the Giant due to pedal strikes. Rode it today and no pedal strikes at all, so that’s REALLY pleasing to me.
Again, with the measuring, the seatpost is laid back a good 3-4deg compared to the Giant and the Forks are much slacker, this gives the Yelli about 3-4″ extra overall wheelbase. Which boy can you notice at times on the tight twisty stuff, the Giant is more flickable at the moment and i got caught out on a couple of corners running a little wide on the Yelli.
The next part where the Yelli excells is in speed. I seemed to be 1 gear higher most sections today, even though both bikes are running the same gearing ratios, both 32T front. Same cassette fitted to both. The flat/downhill speed of the Yelli is fantastic, the thing cracks on and when you hit the downhills, you have to hang on because it picks up speed brilliantly.
The Yelli powers up hills standing really nicely, even seems to climb better sitting down. The perception of less fatigue was something i noticed a few times.
Overall, i think i’m going to end up with a bit of a dilema, despite them both being markedly different, they’re also distinctly simillar. There’s not THAT much difference between the 2 bikes for me to say “well, i’d use this one for XYZ and that one for ABC” So i see the longer term picture that only one of the bikes will remain in the stable long term.
It needs more testing before i begin to make that sort of decision though.