Dave – I’m the problem here – one of them, anyway! Full licence less than a year, no NCB.
jamie – yup. Precisely my thinking. I’d have put the CBR/F 2nd to the VFR in terms of risk, then the Z, then the Blade.
tga – yup, I’m also assuming that’s the case, it’s just that the results are confusing here. Wondering if there’s some thing up with the system, or someone’s put the wrong info in (CBR1000F being mixed up with CBR1000R).
If not, I’m struggling to see why they seem to be as risky as the rating engine says they are. Either there’s something funny about these bike in terms of how desirable they are to thieves (??) or they have a peculiar tendency to hit expensive things when they slide down the road. Or it’s the people who ride them, as above, but that doesn’t quite stack up either.