Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Middleburn slick shift not so slick?
  • FOG
    Full Member

    I have bought a couple of Middleburn slickshift 32 and 36 rings lately, one for a middle in a triple set up and one for the outer on a double, both Shimano cranks. Neither seem to want to shift, mainly in the upward change from granny to middle/outer. They will change eventually but with a lot of grinding and clanking. Down changes are fine. Do I need to adjust derailleurs or whatever or is this just a fact of Middleburn ownership?
    The triple worked fine with a shimano ring, the double is new with a new derailleur.

    Nipper99
    Free Member

    Never had a problem here with similar set up.

    trail_rat
    Free Member

    I found middleburn to middleburn shifts to be good

    When i tried to mix match it all got a bit shitty.

    So i went to all shimanos as they shifted better and lasted just a out as long – significantly cheaper to

    coatesy
    Free Member

    Without all of the ramps etc. of Shimano rings, they’ll never shift as well, but will shift acceptably well if you learn to shift without pressuring the cranks, and at the correct point of the crank’s revolution. Think we’ve all been spoilt by Mr Shimano 🙂

    TurnerGuy
    Free Member

    Think we’ve all been spoilt by Mr Shimano

    which is funny because Shimano used to be sh1t compared to Middleburn 🙂

    Both my Duo setups are OK but not as slick as my older Middleburns used to be.

    bigjim
    Full Member

    they don’t seem to shift very well but seem to be lasting longer than shimano rings so far here

    TurnerGuy
    Free Member

    I think it is the weight savings they went for in the newer rings, my older rings (non slick-shift) were bigger and shifted better and outlasted shimano rings massively.

    Now i just regard the front rings as giving me two different ranges of the rear gears, rather than shifting the front so much – although the front shifting is still OK.

    nickc
    Full Member

    or is this just a fact of Middleburn ownership?

    This, never have been, never will be as good as rings with ramps and pins. End.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Basically, middleburn used to be one of the good options. Then everyone else got better, middleburn didn’t, now they’re pretty poor by comparison to the main manufacturers. But a lot of people still recommend them because of that history

    So you’re basically getting a nice window into what shifting used to be like.

    TurnerGuy
    Free Member

    This, never have been, never will be as good as rings with ramps and pins. End.

    so how come Shimano had ramps and pins years ago but Middleburn shifted far better and lasted far better.

    Macavity
    Free Member

    z1ppy
    Full Member

    Personally I never had issues with shifting (slick shift/hard coat) but didn’t feel they lasted any longer than Shimano Deore, and so weren’t worth double the cost.

    Onzadog
    Free Member

    I bought a full set of slick shift hardcoat rings a couple of years back. Fitted them with new cassette, chain, cables and shifters. Just could not get a half decent shift out of them. Massive chainsuck right from the off.

    Demonstrated this to the place I’d bought them from and they could do no better so refunded the rings. Fitted Shimano and never looked back. I’ve used blackspire and raceface in the past which worked well enough but middleburn are the worst rings I’ve ever used by some considerable margin.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

The topic ‘Middleburn slick shift not so slick?’ is closed to new replies.