is it a cure for everything?
If it makes any specific claims on either the label on the pot or in any of its advertising then those claims need to be in some way substantiated. If the honey really had measureable health benefits the makers would be mad not to put those claims on the label. If they’re not there, not matter what colourful language is there, then the benefit doesn’t exist
Most wonderfoods and superfoods are advertised instead through editorial and ‘news’ stories. Given how cynical people are about marketing and advertising – claiming health effects on ads and labels needs to be substantiated by actual evidence but you can make any old thing up and publish it as ‘news’
The way most superfoods are marketed is you’ll advertise your product as, say, “an excellent source of antioxidants” then use press ‘churnalism’ campaigns to fill the papers with stories about what you deem the benefits of antioxidants to be. In some cases the press journalists themselves are actually food / nutritionism industry marketeers, working for the interests of the industry but on the payroll of the paper. These ready made stories tend to get printed with all the convenient cherry-picked ‘evidence’ bu manage to avoid balancing that to any reference about how, sometimes, anti-oxidant trials have to be stopped early because the participants were dying.
or do i need a middle class 24″ dildoesque pepper grinder with corns from around the ethnicly diverse world?
in the words of the waiter in a restuarunt I was at last week “don’ worry madam, eees big but ee no ‘urt you”