As we’ve had just ably demonstrated, part of the issue is that people use absolutes and outliers in the data to derail proposals for common-sense measures to protect the population.
We’ve had an argument that having ready access to firearms doesn’t influence the rate of suicides….. why? Because there are no guns in Japan, but a high suicide rate. 🙄
Can we agree that people with a history of suicide attempts, or suicidal ideation shouldn’t be sold a gun? SURELY even STW can come to agreement on that? How many lives would it have to save before you could get behind it? 10? 50? 10,000?
FYI – the rationale for bump-fire stocks being introduced, was so that people with limited hand function could still shoot a semi-automatic rifle. How many people do you think that has benefited? We now know the other side of that equation.
Now ask yourself the same question about owning a 50 round drum magazine? or armour piercing rounds? What about incendiary rounds? Silencers? How many lives is being free to “enjoy those freedoms” worth?
The problem is that the gun lobby is blocking even the most sensible updates to legislation – by using ridiculous whataboutery and derailing the debate.
if you must have guns:
handguns for defense
Bolt action rifles for hunting
Shotguns for “sport”
All with sensible restrictions around size, capacity and calbre.
Everything else is just bullsh*t fetishism.