Viewing 3 posts - 41 through 43 (of 43 total)
  • boxer shorts or underwear – bloody expensive!
  • andyl
    Free Member

    Is that a good thing (developed abs to distract from your pants) or a bad thing (nobody gives a s*** any more)?

    For me it’s definitely the latter, hence my collection of ragged M&S pants

    Well the OH got fed up of certain parts of my body being visible through my well worn M&S shreddies which was the trigger for me venturing to said supermarkets for cheaper replacements so it would appear we are on the same track 🙁

    hammyuk
    Free Member

    Nothing worse that crap pants – UA’s for me – worth every penny for fit, durability, etc.
    Not worn a pair out yet and the oldest ones are 3yrs+

    chewkw
    Free Member

    woodlikesbeer – Member
    I paid £30 for 3 in Animal recently. … I saw a three pack of Ted Bakers boxers for £35 and thought that was good value.

    If wearing them guarantee success with women then yes that are good value for money. 😯

Viewing 3 posts - 41 through 43 (of 43 total)

The topic ‘boxer shorts or underwear – bloody expensive!’ is closed to new replies.